Posted on 04/22/2016 2:13:18 PM PDT by Kaslin
The professional political dopes behind #nevertrump didn’t even have enough sense to throw Trump a couple of delegates for appearance’s sake...
And furthermore, calling us zombies is not going to motivate us to go out and vote for Cruz if he did win on the 2nd ballot.
Yeah, he is a big winner, as long as it’s a question of buying and stealing the delegates and lying about it rather than winning the vote. He’s a real pro.
Nice if you can win an election without anybody voting.
Lenin and Mao did it all the time.
Wonder whatever happened to the “representative republic” form of government???
Represent means vote the way the public citizens vote...
There was no public vote in Colorado no matter how many ways it is spun....
Chris Christie had a $175,000 attack add against Tom Tancredo in the last governor election which turned away many republicans and got John Hickenlooper,(D) elected. The DC GOoP lover knocking out conservatives to get democrats elected.
Colorado was Ted Cruz's pyrrhic victory; he shot his credibility to hell for all of thirty delegates.
Where people have a complaint isn't that there is a process. It's that the process is set up to produce a delegate allocation WAY out of sync with the preference of the people. I'd expect that Trump is probably around as popular in Colorado as he is in the states where the people actually have a chance to vote for a candidate (as opposed to voting for a delegate, who will vote for a delegate, who will vote for a delegate). But yet Cruz got all the delegates.
People can understand winner-take-all primaries. Whoever gets the most votes wins it all. People can understand proportional delegates based on how the candidates ended up when the votes were counted. People CAN'T understand how Colorado became winner take all without any record of who the voters of the state preferred. And they don't need to understand it to know it stinks.
And you, Kaslin, have done yourself irreparable damage here in my eyes for posting every derogatory article about Trump from townhall and pjmedia that apparently exists.
And I don't think I'm the only one that's noticed.
What a f mess. You call this understandable? It is pure BS.
The Colorado dopes made Trump the underdog once again. America loves the underdog and they voted for him in New York.
The delegates that were “voted on” were not bound. They were voted on, and then sCruz paid them off.
It bears repeating.
The delegates Cruz acquired in Colorado and Wyoming were obtained not by the results of an open primary election or caucus, but by the election of delegates by GOP party activists who favor Cruz at the party conventions of the two states in question.
Those delegates were not earned by winning the vote of the people, but by selection by party insiders and activists. Anyone not blinded to supporting Ted Cruz with the “by any means necessary” mindset can see the difference in how those delegates were obtained and we don’t like it.
One needs only to look at Cruz’s polling numbers since for proof that the majority of people NOT supporting Cruz didn’t like the way he got those delegates.
Cruz and his supporters will soon find out that those 48 delegates Cruz obtained at those two conventions where the people of Colorado and Wyoming didn’t get to cast their vote for the candidate of their choice will end up being the most costly delegates in election history.
Showing up at a specific time at some designated location and then voting not for a presidential candidate but for a local party activist who will then go on to a county caucus is not exactly going to be particularly responsive to the will of the people. I have a friend who lives in Aspen who told me that at the caucus he went to, there was not even any mention of which candidate the delegates they were sending to the county caucus would be supporting; it was more of a local popularity poll to select a few people popular in the local party organization. Now you can believe that or not, and I recognize at the end of the day, it is responsibility of the caucus-goers to make sure their opinion is heard.... I get all that but in this day and age with all of the available technology, the only reason to deny party members a binding primary election is to make sure that the party insiders control the outcome.
As I posted before. If there was a vote of the peasants as Cruz claimed, what percent of the “little people” supported Cruz, Trump, and Kasich respectively?
Did the final resulting delegates’ bindings reflect the peasants’ percentage of preference?
Colorado was described as a four step process in another simillar posting - real simple[sic]. The more convoluted the process the easier to cover up machinations.
“Charlie Martin writes on science, health, culture and technology for PJ Media. Follow his 13 week diet and exercise experiment on Facebook and at PJ Lifestyle”
I guess his opinion is impotent.
The lame stream media WANT TRUMP to be the nominee — so he can lead the Republicans to landslide losses in November.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.