Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Carolina to Limit Bathroom Use by Birth Gender
New York Times ^ | March 23, 2016 | DAVE PHILIPPS

Posted on 03/24/2016 7:48:06 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2016 7:48:06 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Common sense prevails!


2 posted on 03/24/2016 7:48:42 AM PDT by chae (The Lannisters send their regards--Game of Thrones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The New York Times jumped the shark many years ago.

What will their next headline be? Murderers to be held accountable for killing!


3 posted on 03/24/2016 7:53:00 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

A grown man, with a beard, wearing men’s clothes, was supposed to just be able to walk into the women’s restroom because that’s how he “feels”?

How did these idiots think they were going to be able to judge if he was telling the truth, WHEN YOU CAN EVEN JUDGE THE PERV FOR DOING IT!?


4 posted on 03/24/2016 7:53:05 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chae

to tell u the truth, NC has always had common sense


5 posted on 03/24/2016 7:55:55 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
antidiscrimination policy....Politically Correct speak....
6 posted on 03/24/2016 7:57:00 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What about the queers who’ve had a chopitoffame or the lezboes with the addadicktome?


7 posted on 03/24/2016 7:57:12 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Romans chapter one


8 posted on 03/24/2016 8:01:56 AM PDT by Trophy us (And He will rule with the rod of iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It’s very surreal that this is even a topic of discussion, wether society at large is supposed to bend and entertain the delusions of a few who live in a world of make believe.


9 posted on 03/24/2016 8:08:15 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Yes, America, we've reached the point where we have to pass LAWS saying that if you're a man you have to use the men's bathroom.

Be on the lookout for a big white rabbit with a pocket watch ...

10 posted on 03/24/2016 8:26:59 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

This resulted from the City of Charlotte passing an ordinance requiring businesses to recognize the “right” of access from transgender people to choose which bathroom they would use- in effect forcing businesses to provide the accomodation.

The “push” for the city ordnance came from a group— which it turns out was headed by registered child sex offender (kid you not)... who was, uh, outed. Families, schools, teachers, parents, churches black and white.. all reacted for the potential for sexual offense against minors by these “self-selecting” sexual orientation ordinances. No “local option” on discrimination laws, and btw, on minimum wage. It would also cover... sanctuary cities... so this is really freaking out the Left.

Sheer utter lunacy. And the libs are calling this “regressive”.


11 posted on 03/24/2016 8:33:01 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Use a bathroom based on what someone “feels” is their gender identity..... not their actual gender from birth.

So, a cross dressing pedophile “female” could enter a bathroom, and assault a little boy, who might think he was a woman and therefore... less suspicious.

The point made in all the hearings is just how this opened up the world for sexual predators of every stripe.... against children... let alone adults.


12 posted on 03/24/2016 8:35:32 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I got into it with a lib guest on a talk show yesterday.

The lib claimed that the radio host and likely me and others had been using bathrooms with trannys and didn’t know it.

My retort was ‘then why the need for an ordinance?’.
‘The trannys want to flaunt it and we are powerless to stop it.’


13 posted on 03/24/2016 8:42:22 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
... barring transgender people from bathrooms and locker rooms that do not match the gender on their birth certificates.

That is, denying men access to bathrooms used by women and girls.

14 posted on 03/24/2016 8:49:44 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("The world is full of wonder, but you see it only if you look." ~NicknamedBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chae

“Common sense prevails!”

But not in Charolotte! Even in places like NC where overall, human decency still preavails, NC’a biggest city is the same sort of $hit hole that is SF, NYC, Baltimore, Chicago, etc. Good for the NC legislature! Glad they are majority Republicans. Maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the GOP.


15 posted on 03/24/2016 8:50:42 AM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

North Carolina to Limit Bathroom Use by Birth Gender SEX

Words have a gender, people have a sex and it is biologically determined.

16 posted on 03/24/2016 8:59:18 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Would you want your 13 year daughter sharing a locker room with a 14 year old boy whose nitwit parents have raised as a girl especially when he still has an intact penis?


17 posted on 03/24/2016 8:59:39 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chae
Common sense prevails!

Kinda...

If the law specifically limits the choice to "birth gender", it does present a small quandary for those who actually have undergone surgery and therapy to alter their appearance and equipment, if they haven't had their birth certificate changed (if that's even possible).

I would propose that single-sex bathrooms be reserved for those who have the sex-appropriate genitalia, and those who suffer from the delusion that they are other than what they are can use single-person unisex bathrooms, if available (and I wouldn't make the unisex bathrooms a requirement).

JMHO.

18 posted on 03/24/2016 9:04:57 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

I’ve actually seen unisex bathrooms described as “discriminatory” by the gender-bending crowd. Which just goes to show that the real agenda here is to flaunt their perversion.


19 posted on 03/24/2016 9:15:16 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

In understand their agenda.

Perversity draped in insanity is an ugly thing.

Love your tagline, and I think we have contemplated that advice long enough! ;-P


20 posted on 03/24/2016 9:16:38 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson