Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz steals line from 'The American President' to slam Donald Trump's attack on his wife
NY Daily News ^ | March 23, 2016 | ETHAN SACKS

Posted on 03/23/2016 10:04:10 AM PDT by McGruff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: kiryandil

Sounded like an “I’m sorry what I did made you mad” level of apology from Trump. Out of curiousosity, are you tracking Trump’s apologies for every unsavory show of support and endorsement he receives, or is that a standard you only hold Cruz to?

Truth be known, this PAC is, by their own words, an anti-Trump PAC and not a pro-Cruz PAC per say. They would have likely put out the ad if Cruz wasn’t even in the race based on that.

Have you demanded apologies from Rubio & Kasich as well? Has Trump? Why not?


101 posted on 03/23/2016 5:28:03 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

It’s not Cruz’s PAC, it’s an Anti-Trump PAC. Cruz has condemned the ad, not that the news bothers to report that, but there’s no reason to assume he has any control over the PAC because the PAC is more anti-Trump than pro-Cruz (and a small fry compared to the Anti-Trump “Our Principles” PAC).

Trump did not “handle” the pro-Trump PAC that shut down; he made it clear where he stood and, as Trump fans, they honored that. The Washington Post was also trying to cause legal trouble over Trump’s PAC. Not the same situation here.

About all a super PAC does is run ads for or against candidates; Trump already has all the publicity he needs, so he doesn’t really need any super PACs. The media is not giving any of his competitors anything like so much free publicity.


102 posted on 03/23/2016 7:15:39 PM PDT by Amity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil; DouglasKC; TomasUSMC

“The absence of condemnation or denunciation by Cruz. Cruz tacitly APPROVES of the ad. All he has to do is condemn or denounce the ad. It’s very simple.”

Now he has:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/23/cruz-condemns-trump-s-gutter-politics.html

“That ad was completely inappropriate and we had nothing to do with it,” Cruz told The Daily Beast. “It wasn’t our campaign. It wasn’t even a super PAC affiliated with us in anyway. It was a totally separate group. I don’t know the person who did it—we have no involvement with them whatsoever.”

Satisfied?


103 posted on 03/23/2016 7:36:21 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: unlearner; DouglasKC; TomasUSMC
“That ad was completely inappropriate and we had nothing to do with it,” Cruz told The Daily Beast.

That's all he needed to say. Apparently, by law, he can't coordinate with a Super PAC, so only idiots would assume that his campaign had anything to do with it.

Half a day late, but Ted is learning to do the Right thing.

104 posted on 03/23/2016 7:45:53 PM PDT by kiryandil (Ted Cruz endorsement fails as Ted Cruz fails to win more than 50% of the vote in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan
Sounded like an “I’m sorry what I did made you mad” level of apology from Trump. Out of curiousosity, are you tracking Trump’s apologies for every unsavory show of support and endorsement he receives, or is that a standard you only hold Cruz to?

Why would Ted Cruz have to apologize for an ad that his campaign is not responsible for?

All Cruz had to do was say the ad sucked, like a Quentin Tarantino movie might suck.

It appears as though Cruz FINALLY said just such a thing - late this afternoon.

FINALLY! Gads, Ted - just get it over with.

105 posted on 03/23/2016 7:50:31 PM PDT by kiryandil (Ted Cruz endorsement fails as Ted Cruz fails to win more than 50% of the vote in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You could have just said, “yes”. But I’ll take what I can get.


106 posted on 03/23/2016 7:50:32 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“Apparently, by law, he can’t coordinate with a Super PAC, so only idiots would assume that his campaign had anything to do with it.”

A lot of people here have sworn that Cruz absolutely knew and supported this. So I am glad you recognize their idiocy.

Since Trump made the assumption, are you calling him an idiot? Just asking.


107 posted on 03/23/2016 7:52:39 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
You could have just said, “yes”. But I’ll take what I can get.

I just wanted to note that he dragged his heels until he got clue-by-foured acrost the noggin. :)

Some people are too smart for their own good.

108 posted on 03/23/2016 7:53:13 PM PDT by kiryandil (Ted Cruz endorsement fails as Ted Cruz fails to win more than 50% of the vote in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Since Trump made the assumption, are you calling him an idiot? Just asking.

That's just "politics", as anyone who is not a naif would know.

Cruz and Trump are in The Show [The Big Leagues]. Trump's campaign putting out there that there was "coordination" is just "chin music" - throwing at a dug-in batter's head.

I'll let the results of a Big Leaguer's play speak for itself.

A lot of people here have sworn that Cruz absolutely knew and supported this.

FR is a range of minor league political ball to The Show. Some minor leaguers may opine "coordination", but it's just an opinion. Some may do it tactically.

Even your statement "A lot of people here have sworn" can be parsed for content - "sworn"? "A lot"?

You yourself could be accused of "ladling it on" for effect.

I've been here a REALLY long time. 19 years this month, as a matter of fact. :)

109 posted on 03/23/2016 8:04:24 PM PDT by kiryandil (Ted Cruz endorsement fails as Ted Cruz fails to win more than 50% of the vote in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Hang on a second. You were trying to get away with something here:

A lot of people here have sworn that Cruz absolutely knew and supported this.

Parsing your statement, we note that "A lot of people here have sworn that Cruz absolutely knew and supported this".

He could DEFINITELY have been accused of supporting this - until he got his mind right this afternoon.

Nice try at sliding that one by. :)

110 posted on 03/23/2016 8:10:12 PM PDT by kiryandil (Ted Cruz endorsement fails as Ted Cruz fails to win more than 50% of the vote in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“I’ve been here a REALLY long time. 19 years this month, as a matter of fact.”

Happy FR birthday. I thought I was here a while. You’ve got me beat by a mile.


111 posted on 03/23/2016 8:15:02 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Amity
The first thing Cruz did when he found out about this PAC of Awesomeness ad was call Trump and show his empathy for the picture ad mess. Cruz then went on National TV and disavowed that nasty little PAC. Cruz then laid down the law and said wives and family are off limits.

Oh, Cruz has done none of those things. My bad.

BTW, I have a bridge in a swamp for sale. Are you interested?

Did you watch Lou Dobbs tonight? It would have opened your eyes.

112 posted on 03/23/2016 8:54:03 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Thanks. I'm not sure exactly when in March 97 [it was before joined-on dates - I could tell you stories. :)], but it was EXHILARATING to find FR.

I was a mild Progtard, but was puzzled by the "leaving sh*t out" behavior of my favorite newspapers.

unlearner - I support Cruz, but he's not The Guy. Trump is the only one who knows how to destroy the Media DeathStar.

I hate the Media with undying hate for the impeachment wars, and its precursors. Trump is the only one who can deal death to them.

Maybe Ted Cruz can learn in a few years. :)

113 posted on 03/23/2016 9:02:45 PM PDT by kiryandil (Ted Cruz endorsement fails as Ted Cruz fails to win more than 50% of the vote in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Texican, hey? I'll peel off the Cruz tagline insult in your honor.

I was a Texican in my youth. Lovely country. Always loved Garner State Park, and the Big Bend area.

114 posted on 03/23/2016 9:07:12 PM PDT by kiryandil ("Our Muslim-In-Chief, Barack Obama - the Quislaming in the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Awesome. It will be good to see conservatives come together this election.


115 posted on 03/24/2016 9:10:50 AM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson