Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Delay: Voters Need to Understand “The Delegates Pick the Nominee” (Video)
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 03/05/2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/05/2016 11:06:05 AM PST by nhwingut

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: nhwingut

Tom Delay needs to understand that any effort to thwart the will of the people and deny us our nominee will result in a third party forming to elect Trump in Nov. The elitist pukes can shove it up their ass.


41 posted on 03/05/2016 11:27:20 AM PST by upsdriver (I support Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Premeditated theft is not against the rules, so you can’t call it stealing. They can’t believe everyone is reacting so violently over their open opposition and promise to “stop Trump”.

I guess they will ultimately call it the “will of the voters”, since people voted and all, and obviously their votes were not really for a candidate, but rather a delegation to figure out who ought to be the nominee.

So brilliant of them to be using Tom Delay to get out there and set the lexicon for us. I am already feeling better about things now, at least they won’t be trying to “steal” the nomination, but rather they will be trying to impose their candidate because they can and they know what is best, all according to the rules.

The message: No smoke filled back rooms, we are declaring openly what we are going to do before we do it.

I think part of this is to suppress the vote for Trump, to get people feeling that there is no way Trump is going to be allowed to be the nominee, so why even go vote. They don’t realize how that is actually working in reverse because they just don’t get it yet.


42 posted on 03/05/2016 11:28:15 AM PST by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

People would have had to have read the constitution to know that.....

Good luck with that... lol


43 posted on 03/05/2016 11:28:24 AM PST by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

The personal attacks of a stalwart conservative who paid a high price for defying the liberals who is being denigrated by a bunch of idiots for simply stating a fact that the idiots should already know.


44 posted on 03/05/2016 11:28:37 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

I know he is technically correct, not necessarily morally correct.


45 posted on 03/05/2016 11:29:03 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Timmy
Delay is absolutely correct.
If you get your wish for a brokered convention let us know how that works out for you Timmy.
46 posted on 03/05/2016 11:29:05 AM PST by lewislynn (Ted Cruz: " I'll never have 'a plane with my name" (or a Presidential seal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Cavuto don't give a shi!. He is a simple mined jackass and has no idea that the Republican people are going heavily for Trump. Not his ars! Maybe it is time for these elites to realize that the President is selected by the people not a bunch of foolish corrupt politicians and journalists.
47 posted on 03/05/2016 11:30:01 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stegall Tx

HEAR! HEAR! WELL SAID!!


48 posted on 03/05/2016 11:30:05 AM PST by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Timmy
I think everyone here is aware of the rules -- nobody thinks the nominee is selected by popular vote. But when was the last time there was a brokered convention, or a convention without a clear front-runner? 1976? All this sudden interest on the part of the party elite in reminding people that the popular candidate doesn't have to be nominated doesn't arise out of a love of the process.
49 posted on 03/05/2016 11:30:18 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

Enjoy it while you can.

Before too long you’re going to be right there with The John Birch Society.


50 posted on 03/05/2016 11:31:44 AM PST by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Then, why all the ignorant comments?


51 posted on 03/05/2016 11:31:44 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

And lots of folks swore Trump would win Iowa and they were wrong too....

We ALL speculate here all the time... get over yourself.


52 posted on 03/05/2016 11:32:24 AM PST by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Religion and Politics

No, this should encourage the Trump voters to go and vote. If he gets 50% then he gets the nomination no questions asked.

Trump supporters needs to stop whining and go out there and try to get their man to 50%.

If I were a Trump supporter that’s what I’d do, instead of worrying about it being “stolen”.

You almost sound like you don’t really think Trump can get to 50%, and want to pre-emptively argue that he should get the nomination even if he falls short because he has the plurality.


53 posted on 03/05/2016 11:32:53 AM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
Like Tom Delay needs to talk, didn’t he get ‘booted’ out of the Senate?

OK, I was hoping you would correct or at least learn from your mistake, but apparently not.

First off, Tom Delay, as noted in the first line of the article (and the second of your response) was a member of the House of Representatives, not the Senate.

Second, he was indicted by a corrupt Democrat AG in Austin who took it to two grand juries because the charges were so weak, the first wouldn't recommend an indictment. As an honorable man, he resigned from the House of Representatives to defend himself.

What was the result of the charges?

54 posted on 03/05/2016 11:34:20 AM PST by Stegall Tx (If Republicans choose a liberal candidate, they have chosen to lose my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

You are assuming that people being angry that the elite want a brokered convention arises from an ignorance of the rules. We know that the delegates choose the nominee. We don’t like that the party elite want the delegates to choose a candidate other than the popular front-runner, something that hasn’t happened in quite some time, if ever.


55 posted on 03/05/2016 11:34:55 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

They’re not “ignorant.”

They’re an ultimatum.


56 posted on 03/05/2016 11:35:24 AM PST by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Read the comments. They do not support your thesis.


57 posted on 03/05/2016 11:36:04 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher
Not sure how you get that from my message. I said that is what they think, that by opposing Trump now and saying they are going to nullify his supporters, they must be thinking that will suppress the vote. I said it would have the opposite effect.

Also, I personally saw to it that every member of my extended family got to the polls and voted. 100%. I've done my voting part until November now.

58 posted on 03/05/2016 11:36:30 AM PST by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Stegall Tx

If you can’t read and comprehend what it is that is being posted, maybe you should go back to school and learn the three R’s....

Your problem, not mine!!!


59 posted on 03/05/2016 11:36:35 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

Could be a lot of people in here think YOUR comments are ignorant...


60 posted on 03/05/2016 11:36:52 AM PST by JBW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson