Only 1200?! That’s nothing. Mothers insist on killing more than twice that amount every single day of the year here in the US but we’re supposed to be concerned about the hypothetical 1200 annually? Shoot, the left would pray for those deaths if they were unborn children.
Always watch for the weasel words folks. We need to start pointing them out anytime we read a "global warming/climate change" article.
Would, could, should, might, may, maybe etc. Y'all know the drill ;)
So the greenhouse effect will cause the exact opposite of what happens in actual greenhouses?
Ok, that makes sense...
His analysis could be very correct. Of course, it’s based on the assumption of global warming. Take away global warming and the actual results will be vastly different from his projection.
The trouble with all of this is that there’s an industry that’s out to show that global warming is real based on questionable data and modeling. Then there’s a bigger industry that takes all of this at face value and projects all of the harmful affects that will accrue because of global warming.
Who’s going to get the research funding? The guy who projects that thousands or millions will starve or cook to death or the fellow who wants to write a paper saying that the 21st century’s climate will be like the 20th century’s?