Posted on 03/04/2016 6:55:04 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Always watch for the weasel words folks. We need to start pointing them out anytime we read a "global warming/climate change" article.
Would, could, should, might, may, maybe etc. Y'all know the drill ;)
So the greenhouse effect will cause the exact opposite of what happens in actual greenhouses?
Ok, that makes sense...
His analysis could be very correct. Of course, it’s based on the assumption of global warming. Take away global warming and the actual results will be vastly different from his projection.
The trouble with all of this is that there’s an industry that’s out to show that global warming is real based on questionable data and modeling. Then there’s a bigger industry that takes all of this at face value and projects all of the harmful affects that will accrue because of global warming.
Who’s going to get the research funding? The guy who projects that thousands or millions will starve or cook to death or the fellow who wants to write a paper saying that the 21st century’s climate will be like the 20th century’s?
Fortunately for California, there will be no shortage of nuts.
Those poor people. After surviving the rising sea levels, the end of oil production and the end of snow only to die from lack of the lonely vegetable. (Some time after Dr Marco Springmann retires and is living off a pension)
I'm beginning to think that my hemorrhoids are caused by globull (shit) warming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.