[Paco]

I’m no expert but she didn’t have a trusted computing base to begin with and no reference monitor. So how would they even know if she was hacked?

[GreenHornet]

That’s like saying: I poisoned somebody, but they didn’t die, so no crime was committed.

[GreenHornet]

That’s like saying: I poisoned somebody, but they didn’t die, so no crime was committed.

[Senator_Blutarski]

Oh, the NYT says this? About Hillary?

Well then, that settles that. Obviously this is a fake scandal created by a waste right wing conspiracy.

Now let me crawl back onto the turnip truck I fell from.

[Pollster1]

https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/exam-information/ceh-exam-312-50

Certified Ethical Hacker: The exam 312-50 tests CEH candidates on the following 18 domains.

Introduction to Ethical Hacking
Footprinting and Reconnaissance
Scanning Networks
Enumeration
System Hacking
Malware Threats
Sniffing
Social Engineering
Denial of Service
Session Hijacking
Hacking Webservers
Hacking Web Applications
SQL Injection
Hacking Wireless Networks
Hacking Mobile Platforms
Evading IDS, Firewalls, and Honeypots
Cloud Computing
Cryptography

Anyone who has passed this comparatively basic exam can attack a poorly-secured server and leave no trace - purely to evaluate security, of course. Anyone worldwide who received email from our State Department knew there was an unsecured server with sensitive information. The conclusion is obvious.

[M Kehoe]

Welcome to FR.

I believe this as much as I believe in unicorns pooping Skittles.

5.56mm

[dartuser]

A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

Baahhhhhaaaaaa ...

Like a text file can't be scrubbed ...

I was waiting for something idiotic like this to be released to the public.

[ronnie raygun]

Oh ok nothing to see here, continue running for president queeny

[SteveH]

without physical security which was lacking, the logs prove nothing (except to NYT idiot reporters).

[sten]

cd /var/logs
rm -rf .

[Synthesist]

What a totally pathetic so called piece of “journalism”!

They even have to admit latter in the article that the lack of evidence in the “security logs” does NOT prove that Clinton’s unsecured server was never hacked. Good grief…

And BTW NYT, it is against the law to merely mishandle classified information. So, even if Clinton’s unsecured server was never hacked, she (and many others) can and should still be charged, prosecuted, and sentenced for “willfully and intentionally” mishandling sensitive information, easily putting it at risk of unauthorized access. I don’t recall Gen. Patraus having been shown that his mishandling of classified information actually resulted in unauthorized access, but that still did NOT prevent him from getting into serious trouble.