Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mark Levin Show, M-F, 6pm-9pm EDT, WABC-AM, Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016.
The Mark Levin Show ^ | Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 03/02/2016 2:55:30 PM PST by Carriage Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-189 next last
To: MUDDOG

I think he’ll win Florida. Rubio is not liked here at all.

I have not a clue about Ohio.

What really worries me at this point is the GOP pulling some crapola at the convention and giving the nomination to Romney/ Ryan again...

At that point, my head explodes.


61 posted on 03/02/2016 4:42:58 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Geezuz, who is this screeching howler monkey on the phone now?


62 posted on 03/02/2016 4:44:47 PM PST by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sloop

Search my posts, you will find where I listed them specifically.


63 posted on 03/02/2016 4:44:48 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sloop

“I am not supporting a candidate because of statz - no conservative is”

Yes, my mind is terribly warped. I didn’t say you were supporting any candidate because of stats. I said that Mark is interpreting the stats to prop up the spirits of Cruz supporters, who if they take an honest look at the statistics and the polls and the way forward will realize that their candidate is unlikely to prevail.

The stats are what they are. It doesn’t mean you should stop supporting your candidate, but you should realize that he’s very likely to lose.

Sure, you can TRUMPet the virtues of your candidate, and I might not disagree, but he’s almost certainly going to lose to the candidate Trumptardz like me support.

We’ll see.


64 posted on 03/02/2016 4:45:06 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Sounded like ‘Detroit disco’.


65 posted on 03/02/2016 4:45:20 PM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sloop

And furthermore, sloop, in campaigns mud gets thrown. Most of it doesn’t stick, but it certainly gets thrown.

Why do you think of all the things that could stick or not stick to Cruz, why did the charge of “liar” seem to catch, linger and do damage?

If someone calls you a liar, but you have never lied, then it’s nothing. Doesn’t matter. The person calling you a liar is the liar.

If someone calls you a liar, and you did lie, then it’s a problem.


66 posted on 03/02/2016 4:48:21 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: chris37
I have - and your posts are lies

and ‘campaign’ is not cruz

you say you know cruz lied about why he voted for a bill - even though cruz says otherwise - news flash - you do not know why he voted for a bill - you only have what he says

you are not as smart as you think you are

67 posted on 03/02/2016 4:48:33 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
cruz probably will lose the nomination

I will support him anyway - NOT because he might or might not get the nod - I don't vote based on that

but I will not vote for trump - because he is not conservative - which you trumptardz will not debate

68 posted on 03/02/2016 4:51:12 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sloop

I’m not a liar, sloop, and I don’t post lies.

Cruz is responsible for his campaign. Whatever his campaign does falls on his shoulders and no one else’s.

No one else is going to be hurt by Iowa except Cruz, so he had best be concerned about what happened.

Secondly, he lied about what happened in Iowa at a Monday morning press conference in SC when he said in his own voice that all they did was pass on a news story. That clearly is not all that they did. That was a lie, told by Cruz.

And yes, I do have more than what Cruz said as to why he voted for a bill. I know that people vote for things because they are for those things. And people vote against things, because they are against those things.

Just because Cruz said a thing, does not mean that I have to believe that thing, and I don’t. What I believe is that he lied about why he voted for that bill. It’s an incredibly weak and tortured explanation.

Tell me, sloop, would you have voted for the Corker Bill?

And I usually don’t go around saying that I’m smart, sloop.

What I usually say is that there are many people in this world who are smarter than me.

I have many faults, but dishonesty is not one of them.


69 posted on 03/02/2016 4:56:35 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I disagree

Krauthammer and Rove and Hume etc all claimed he had to get 300 delegates to be considered winning

In fact some said 300 made it a done deal for the nomination

He got 319

Now they ignore that and on to the next GOPe constructed goal posts


70 posted on 03/02/2016 4:59:11 PM PST by wardaddy (Ted Cruz endorser of Rubio is off my Christmas list......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: chris37

let me teach you what a lie is

trump says he is worth 10 billion

fact is its 4

that is a blatant lie

you upset about that?


71 posted on 03/02/2016 5:00:30 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

It’s possible that my analysis is wrong.

I also heard them say that, and I did read that he is at 319 this morning.

But I have not watched any TV news today, so I am not aware that moved any goal posts, but that would not surprise me at all.

Still though I would like to see a Trump/ Cruz ticket. I think that is the way to go.


72 posted on 03/02/2016 5:02:55 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: chris37
but trump was not responsible for the companies that declared bankruptcy

double standards for trumptardz

post proof if its that ‘clear’ - you can't

I would have done what cruz did - do everything I could to defeat it with poison pillz

73 posted on 03/02/2016 5:03:36 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; miss marmelstein; onyx; Pelham; blam

I’m on your side and have always like you going back to your avatar but you’re too polite to these Cruzmonkeys

Not all Cruz folks but some are hateful some beaches

I don’t like Cruz anymore

His speech last nite after trump was gracious to him

Common

That’s a Deep South thing..,,,he acted common


74 posted on 03/02/2016 5:04:16 PM PST by wardaddy (Ted Cruz endorser of Rubio is off my Christmas list......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sloop

And ...subject change!

Let me ask you, sloop, would you have voted for the Corker Bill?

As a conservative, is that something you would sign your name to?


75 posted on 03/02/2016 5:04:43 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sloop

It wasn’t defeated with any poison pills.

It’s just the law now, and an illegal one at that.


76 posted on 03/02/2016 5:05:48 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: sloop

“but I will not vote for trump - because he is not conservative - which you trumptardz will not debate”

This trumptard can see that by eviscerating the GOPe we are advancing the cause of conservatism, even if the tool by which the GOPe is destroyed is not conservative.

But we’ll advance conservatism without you, I suppose.

I want illegal immigration stopped. nobody has a more conservative position on that than trump, so this trumptard supports him on that basis alone.

I’ve got a few significant Constitutional concerns regarding Cruz, but it I can’t be bothered to go into it, since even you acknowledge it doesn’t matter - he’s probably going to lose.


77 posted on 03/02/2016 5:07:31 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: chris37
tell you what else I would not do - support obamacare - like trump does

nor would I donate to democrapz

nor would I waffle about abortion

with all you claim to know about what is inside the mind of cruz - tell us trump's real stand on abortion - all you have is the waffling wordz of a liar - you have no clue how trump will govern

just his ‘I will make America great again - I'm rich’ - every bit as psychobabble as ‘hope and change’

78 posted on 03/02/2016 5:08:34 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Tell me. This politcal season has been crazy.


79 posted on 03/02/2016 5:08:36 PM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Levin admitting Grahamnesty’s endorsement doesn’t help Cruz. Whodathunk it. LOL.


80 posted on 03/02/2016 5:09:59 PM PST by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson