Posted on 02/27/2016 3:26:09 AM PST by true believer forever
Yeah and I an Apollo Astronaut, with a PHD in recognizing BS. Everyone, ‘ceptin JimRob are all the same here.
What you think no one else actually reads the Trump dribble you post?
Have a blessed weekend, X-spurt.
Should be Joseph Wharton. Pardon the typo!
I did realize that, and just wanted to expand on it for people who may not know about that. Kristinn once upbraided me for going into too much detail. Seems it would apply here! No offense meant!
Never called you an idiot. Evidently you don’t comprehend the written word.
You, my esteemed high IQ rock of gibraltar, are an as whole.
I must agree about the ones who post on most of the threads, although there are Cruz supporters who restrain themselves from the constant negativity. The other shocker to me is -- I thought it was only liberals who project all the time, but the projection of some of these folks is just appalling.
You’re new here. It shows. Can the personal insults and you may last.
Ohh I looked. I also checked the FR poster history to see if he had bias for Trump. I found plenty of evidence that he did (in radical favor of Trump). This is an election year and people will say anything to cover the tracks of someone they like.
Just as I checked your posting history to see if you just as wild. I found that you probable support Trump, but you are not radical about it and have a history of sticking to subjects that interest you which often resides outside the scope of just politics.
So I am going to assume your statement to be legit somewhat. If phrased to be a question, I would read it to ask "What makes you take the word of the liberal AG over the FR commentor?".
Answer: I don't exactly take the AG's word over said Freeper, but I do think the AG would be talking to actual people that did go to this unaccredited school (or whatever it is). I would hope the AG does have some backing of truth to cover his tracks because Trump is not one to shy away from suing if misrepresented. Trump has the pockets to do it and the motivation to save face in an election year, so you better not be making crap up.
Since it is an election year, all things are suspect of course, as possible being politically motivated. Could a bunch of liberals join together to try to muddy the water, sure, it is possible, but perhaps would of took a lot more planning than really is in the realm of really feasible. The odds that they knew in advance Trump was going to run so they could enlist in a program with his name on it just for the sake of trying to derail a possible future presidential run is asking a lot of a liberal. Not saying there is not some smart crafty liberals, but you have to admit it is a stretch.
Anyhoo, just saying yes I did take in consideration the FR opinion. I did what little research time allotted to see if I thought their opinion was relevant to hold in high esteem. I found yourself a more worthy person to respond to, since I think you motives are more based in getting to the truth of the matter. Truth, which I think true conservatives are interested in knowing, so I answered as truthfully as I knew how (giving I didn't really want to invest a lot of time in doing so, because the subject is not really that high a priority for me).
The answer given to me from said member basically said, they went to lots of similar programs. That they were not subject to being required to fill out evaluations forms as the AG said Trump University people were. I asked myself how relevant that information was (source reliable, and did his have first hand information). Both answers were on shaky ground. The AG as rightfully suspect for political reason I also vetted. With the information given I could not come to a concrete decision. I just wanted to arm myself with both sides of the story. Again, time limitations do not allow each of us to be experts, thus we speculate on a forum.
I tend to ramble at times and don't proofread as well as I should.
A fair reply, FRiend. It wasn’t really a question so much as an observation, but I appreciate your taking the time to explain your thought process.
Trump University has a 98% approval rating. I could have settled but won't out of principle!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.