Posted on 02/25/2016 7:06:19 AM PST by smoothsailing
It's like coming home and finding your house Occupied...
True.
Lots of times Rush presents someone else’s argument, even a long argument, in order to explain it, dissect it or mock it.
Many times I have heard drop-in listeners later claim that Rush came out for this or that, when nothing of the kind actually happened.
You worship. I have stuff to do.
I requested a link, and you come at me with that much hostility? It’s disproportionate.
‘Lots of times Rush presents someone else’s argument, even a long argument, in order to explain it, dissect it or mock it.’
That’s been my experience with Rush, too. In this case, no one wants to say why Rush read this particular argument. I.e.: whether to explain it, dissect it., etc. Some are saying he had no reason at all for reading it. Doesn’t sound like Rush’s MO, but I haven’t had time to listen to the YouTube segment yet.
Did Wilson state in so many words that Johnson was long gone at the beginning of his encounter with Brown?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/248128351/Darren-Wilson-Testimony
Q: Is Dorian Johnson anywhere around?
A: I never saw him around after the very beginning. Once he walked past my car, I never saw him again.
The reason that Johnson was not charged with assaulting Wilson, was because Wilson testified that Brown and ONLY Brown assaulted him.
Sundance is a writer of fantasy:
“#4) Lastly, and this one REALLY stuns me, in that no-one in the media has picked up on it: why is Dorian Johnson allowed to get away with denying his physical involvement in attacking Darren Wilson?
Especially when there is absolute physical evidence that proves Dorian was an active participant in the physical assault.”
I take it you have a low opinion of the working man.
How sad for you.
Sorry - link yourself - I don’t get paid to serve you.
I read that Wilson said he found the pair walking together, and blocked them both with his car. Are you saying he found only Brown?
Well, considering Levin, Rush, et al., are the “working man” it must be you that has a low opinion of the working man.
How sad for you.
“Sorry - link yourself - I don’t get paid to serve you.”
I tried to access for free it on his website. It won’t let me without being a 24/7 member. You made the claim, so prove it.
I havn’t criticized them, so hold your fire.
Pffft! If Sundance weren’t a lying hack he wouldn’t be working in a grocery store, he’d be on with Rush, Levin et al.
Would you go to your grocery store clerk and ask him to operate on you or for tax advice. Somehow, I doubt it.
Well, that’s exactly what you’re doing. Some guy sets up a website, spouts out an opinion that you like, and suddenly he’s a genius.
I never saw what all the fuss was about with Obama. My brother would go on and on about what an inspiring speaker Obama was, the greatest ever, etc, and I just never saw it.
Now Trump. I am just not feeling it.
The answer is perfectly clear to anyone who reads the testimony. The more relevant question: Is this complete bull**** posted by Sundance even defensible in light of that testimony?
"#4) Lastly, and this one REALLY stuns me, in that no-one in the media has picked up on it: why is Dorian Johnson allowed to get away with denying his physical involvement in attacking Darren Wilson?
Especially when there is absolute physical evidence that proves Dorian was an active participant in the physical assault."
They may have finally shredded themselves against that rough, multifaceted thing which is truth.
What are you so angry about? I havn’t said I agreed with sundance on this article. All I’ve done is post it for discussion.
Much of what is posted “that questions Trump” is pot shots. Pot shots aren’t right no matter who does them (no, not even Trump himself).
Still won’t answer my question. Fine, get on with your life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.