Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bad news for Ted Cruz: his eligibility for president is going to court
Vox ^ | 02/18/16 | Dara Lind and Jeff Stein

Posted on 02/19/2016 6:36:53 AM PST by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-337 next last
To: Sacajaweau

The 14th amendment is adequate to disqualify Cruz. It does not do the same for Rubio, and it (the 14th amendment) does not alter or define NBC.


121 posted on 02/19/2016 7:28:16 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

There’s a reason every candidate does their own internal polling (which they keep to themselves) and doesn’t rely on media polls.


122 posted on 02/19/2016 7:28:23 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: null and void

you sound like and expert in this area as i am not. As for Jarrett, i guess thatwould be right, horribly contemplated. but if the ruling is be born of two american parents, and on American soil, so be it. I am not a Cruz supporter but i dont doubt his loyalty to the U.S.


123 posted on 02/19/2016 7:28:31 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
It is a Carson supporter who filed this action
___________________________________________
It would have to personally be Carson, not a supporter. Even with Carson it may not be good enough for some slippery Federal judges. I remember in California when Orly filed a challenge with Alan Keyes, who, I think got on the California ballot, but the court nonetheless dismissed on the grounds that he was not a ‘viable’ candidate with any chance of winning so he was not meaningfully harmed. Go figure. Their excuses seem to be boundless. Another consideration, if the challenge is filed by a candidate too late in the campaign cycle, they may apply some type of laches theory to the action. Bottom line, if they can avoid doing their job on this one, they will.
124 posted on 02/19/2016 7:29:45 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
"this clause is present in order to prevent a subject of the King of England becoming President"

Why would they want to prevent a subject of the King of England from becoming President? For exactly the same reason that we would not want a President influenced by foreign powers at this time. The question is far from moot!

125 posted on 02/19/2016 7:29:49 AM PST by JayGalt (Come not between the nazgul and his prey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Ben Carson and the rest are the candidates most hurt by the ineligible candidates Cruz and Rubio being in the race, but the rest of US are hurt more.

The nation's integrity, our nationalism and the very definition of our American identity are the stakes in this card game the demonrats and the republicans have been playing since 2008.

I pray to God that we, the people, finally come to our senses and get back to following The Rules again.

126 posted on 02/19/2016 7:30:31 AM PST by GBA (Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

Nowhere in my post did I purport to define NBC. What I said was that the 14th amendment disposes of the Cruz case. Cruz is naturalized. Saying a person is naturalized does not define NBC, but defining NBC is not necessary to decide the case of a naturalized person.


127 posted on 02/19/2016 7:30:46 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Durbin

“Why is Ben Carson still in the race?”

He wants to be. He has the right to be. He is, without doubt, ELIGIBLE to be.

Why are two top candidates whose eligibility is in question still in the race? If they loved America more than themselves, they would step aside and do the right thing instead of subjecting the country to months of future chaos.


128 posted on 02/19/2016 7:31:25 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Romans 8:38-39)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

I agree on an AG spot for Cruz. Why Kasich, out of curiosity? What do you see there?

Not picking a fight, genuinely curious.


129 posted on 02/19/2016 7:31:31 AM PST by Psalm 144 ("Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded" - James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Even strict original intent crowd believe that this clause is present in order to prevent a subject of the King of England becoming President. This issue is moot.

The current occupier was a dual US Citizen (through his mother's citizenship) and British Subject (through his father's citizenship).

It's working out as well for us has having a Corsican leader did for France, an Austrian for Germany, and a Ukrainian for Russia...

130 posted on 02/19/2016 7:32:02 AM PST by null and void (This is "They live", and most people would rather fight you than put on the glasses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

What about Cruz father? Where was he born? What was his nationality? What country was he a citizen of? Where did he live when Cruz was born? Seems like these would have some effect on the outcome.


131 posted on 02/19/2016 7:32:07 AM PST by Rennes Templar (I'm pro gun control: keep your guns under your control at all times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

That’s nothing. Illegals from anywhere can drop a baby here that is elegible to be Prez because they were born on this soil but no American parent??? Give me Cruz.


132 posted on 02/19/2016 7:32:26 AM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m with you, this is not bad news, despite what the [un]enlightened1 might think. I was actually hoping it would happen sooner.

I just wonder why none of these “Republicans” so concerned with Cruz’s eligibility never challenged Obama’s eligibility...


133 posted on 02/19/2016 7:32:41 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

I’ve looked for a docket entry, and have not found one. I waould also like to read the Cruz response. I have sseen the Cruz response and Memorandum of law submitted in the Electoral Board case (below), and am curious what adjustments, if any, were made going to the courthouse.


134 posted on 02/19/2016 7:32:51 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Carson can personally attach himself to the suit at any time with a paragraph petition to the court.


135 posted on 02/19/2016 7:33:20 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"As a Cruz supporter, I actually see this as good news."

Same here. Get it settled and done with.

AND I like the precedent. ALL candidates should be challenged on their eligibility to be POTUS!

136 posted on 02/19/2016 7:33:40 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

ok dude, you lost me, so do u think a child born overseas to one american citizen is american or not? what if she was a single mom? i dont have a dog in this commentorial fight and im not an ardent Cruz supporter, but i agree if it is as truly muddles as its being portrayed then the court should rule and we move on.


137 posted on 02/19/2016 7:33:45 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

ok dude, you lost me, so do u think a child born overseas to one american citizen is american or not? what if she was a single mom? i dont have a dog in this commentorial fight and im not an ardent Cruz supporter, but i agree if it is as truly muddles as its being portrayed then the court should rule and we move on.


138 posted on 02/19/2016 7:33:46 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Durbin

[So he only cares about himself and how he can personally benefit from this. Got it.]

You’re just chapped because because it’s affecting your preferred candidate. Your comment is so transparent.

If Cruz were doing this to Trump or anyone else, you’d be singing his praises.


139 posted on 02/19/2016 7:33:46 AM PST by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt
"212. Of the citizens and natives." "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

*********

And that father in Edward's case would be Cuban or Canadaian, would it not?

140 posted on 02/19/2016 7:34:19 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson