No more Establishment Republicans for offic like Rubio, Jeb and Kasich.
News Flash to those who are living in a None Reality World!
The Constitution is ALL READY DEAD!
What is in control now is the Beast(EVIL) and that Beast(EVIL) will not go away while Men Pledge Allegiance to it vice God!
I am disturbed at the passing of Scalia, but if the Constitution depends on the existence of just one man, then we are already finished.
People need to back off the drama.
Congress can change the number of justices on the Supreme Court without a Constitutional amendment. They did it several times in the 1800’s. Maybe it’s time they at least doubled the Court to 18. With more members, it wouldn’t be so dependent on one member to tip it this way or that.
Obama is peeing himself and can’t wait to put the third stooge on the court
If we get Trump or a Democrat, it’s definitely over.
Cruz will lead the effort to prevent Obama from appointing Scalia’s successor. Trump will ramble incoherently about constitutionalism. It may be enough to swing some Trump supporters to Cruz, but it’s unlikely, because Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue...
His death won’t mark the end of the Constitution. The ball is in the Senate and those eunuchs will fumble it so the death of the Constitution and America will be their fault.
If the Constitution isn’t more than one man, no matter how great, it wouldn’t have lasted ten years.
What I want to know is how the regime managed to kill him. I hope the autopsy is thorough!
Response: Replace "could" with "shall"
Comment: Organize and find leaders ready to fight.
Roe v Wade was a signal. The death of Scalia is the end. The left has succeeded in convincing everyone that The Court makes law. So, yes, bloodshed ahead.
USSC? Constitution?
POSOTUS already OBLITERATED the “charter of negative liberties”. He swept it away with 4 words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y
Trump needs to be all over this. He needs to publically call out McConnell, Cornyn, and the rest of the GOPe POS, who are probably already planning on caving on this. If Trump talks about it, the media will be all over it.
I will be sorely disappointed if Trump doesn’t actively engage in this!
In the end if a law(including but not limited to a Constitutional law) is interpreted in any way other than the way it was by the writers when passed/ratified. It is not a law but a judgement of men in black robes, indeed you can’t even call that a legitimate interpenetration.
The whole point of rule of law is so that men sitting in the court and its appointing executive office can’t simply make up the law as they go. The idea of a ‘living’ constitution as they euphemistically call it is the idea of the rule of men who’s judgement and standards change case by case by their personal values and assessment of the ‘times’ and people before them thus also the nature of the law without any laborious act of the legislator or for that matter constitutional limitation changes in each case. Invariably according to their desires.
Its like you deliberately ignoring what your boss told you to do and going off and doing your own thing which you claim is tangentially related to your boss’s orders.
You will get fired as your boss will see you hijacking the business and sabotaging its common goals. Yet that is precisely what today’s ‘court’ does with regard to our Constitution.
It is not obedience to law of the people, nor is it good behavior by the so called employees of the people. Just as it is not rule of law, but rule of dishonorable men with their own agenda and no accountability.
To that end we as conservatives should see injustices like John Roberts and Kennedy just like we see injustices like Kagen and Ginsburg. As Oligarchs/dictators, not men or women of law. To that end if we must choose between them the question is really what dictator you would prefer to live under Roberts vs Kagen.
We of course agree that idealy we should like the rule of law and republican democracy but that is not always obtainable
There is no end to the Constitution.
The Constitution?
When did Der Trumpenflipper's business history -- festooned with a Who's Who of post-modern organized criminals -- ever make it self evident he'd give a hoot about something so trivial as the Lawful framework for constituting how the Republic was intended to do bidness?
Editor's Note, 8/10/15: Four years ago, Wayne Barett reported shady business deals ahead of Trump's flirtation with a White House run. After first exposing Trump’s ties to organized crime in his 1992 book, Barrett looked into his most recent business dealings and discovered the following:
* One associate who was an "unindicted co-conspirator" in a massive 2000 stock swindleâ€â€Âand escaped prison only by helping to convict 19 others, including six members of New York crime families
* Two associates who served prison time on cocaine charges
* Another partner prosecuted for trafficking underage girls after a dramatic helicopter raid on a yacht off the Turkish coast
* A pending lawsuit against Trump Soho that alleges daughter Ivanka, among others, made fraudulent misrepresentations
Just fog Ed about dat.
It’s BREITBART B R E I T B A R T not Brietbart. Copy the source