Posted on 02/11/2016 10:52:13 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/06/ted-cruz-were-going-to-build-a-wall/ Cruz We are going to build a wall
Also, on the original post. The man had an opinion. He doubts that Ted Cruz will build the wall. I call that anything but a non-response.
Nice to know you talk to the Sugar Plum Fairy. Never met her myself since I don’t believe in Fairy-Tales. It WOULD be Ted Cruz she’d support I suppose, but wouldn’t know for a fact as you seem to.
I hope Cruz can pull out SC. We need more time for people to watch these men under stress and figure out which has the character to lead.
No, I don’t think I’ve led a “sheltered” life...I’m a Vietnam veteran...I’m a former high school and college football coach...I’m 67 years old and lived, camped, and hiked all over the Smokies all my life...
Nope...I haven’t been “sheltered”...Also, I’ve heard that word all my life...I’ve never seen anyone fight over it...LOL
Where did you grow up?
Sorry, but Trump won’t be able to pull his usual tricks and use illegal immigrant laborers and payoffs to the mob to grease the skids on his construction jobs. Those things don’t fly when it comes to federal projects.
..........................................................
No, but 10 Times over budget and years behind schedule do. How long has it taken to get ANY Federal jobs done? Years and billions more and STILL not completed.
i agree.
The article is/was about unifying the party; it wasn’t about the building of a wall. Building, or not building, a wall was introduced as a squirrel running across the trail to distract from the original article.
There are other threads where that may be appropriate.
But, I stand firm, the original post was not responsive. I don’t judge if it is valid; just pertinent to the discussion.
I’m sorry you can’t see the difference.
Gwjack
I care about where he’s stood on multiple issues and who he’s supported on multiple occasions and what he’s actually said.
...........................................
He has said, “Let’s Make America Great Again.” and I agree!
Seems you just want to continue with the same old, same old lawyer-lifetime politician snake speak.
Right! Not everyone in the Republican Party is a Conservatives conservative some of US are fiscal Conservatives, social moderates, America First, Strong Military or just leave US the hell alone already type of voters! I’m getting really sick of this purity test bandied around here:-)
Second you last sentence has a “:-)” at the end...so I really don’t mean to start anything other than a discussion...
Does your “social moderate” position mean you are pro-abortion?
Rush Limbaugh has said repeatedly that for many years the “moderates” in the Republican Party have really wanted to be rid of the social conservatives in the party.
Is that how you feel about US “social conservatives”?
The moderates say we need to drop our opposition to same sex marriage and abortion to get votes.
Is that how you feel?
I didn’t look at your posting history...but do you support Trump?
Is it because he’s not really a “social Conservative”?
You know that FR is a pro-life... pro-God website.
Again I’m not trying to do anything but discuss your social moderate positions.
I guess I can’t imagine how killing a baby in the mothers womb is acceptable to anyone.
Again I’m assuming by your “social moderate” stance you mean pro-abortion...
Forgive me if my assumption is wrong.
“He has said, “Let’s Make America Great Again.†and I agree!”
Ok, unlike you, I need more than a slogan.
“Reform Social Security and Medicare/” You mean eliminate them, don’t you? The only reform necessary is to put the money back in Social Security and Medicare that has been stolen for other pet projects like Obamacare. Medicare recipients continue to pay into medicare every month. SS has been a lifetime deal. We should help those who can’t help themselves, but that doesn’t mean all the freeloaders who won’t work and all the illegals that are taken care of on our dollar. He has clearly stated not to fund abortions. Other care is okay. I definitely want the Military rebuilt. We are in the most sorry state we’ve been in for a hundred years!
I see the WHOLE picture and am not a tunnel vision person.....like a lot of lawyers are.
The article is/was about unifying the party; it wasn’t about the building of a wall. Building, or not building, a wall was introduced as a squirrel running across the trail to distract from the original article.
...........................................
Let me explain something to you. the “party” as in the ESTABLISHMENT is pretty well 100% AGAINST ever building the wall. They have had since Reagan days all the time in the world to build it. it is STILL NOT built, so UNIFYING the PARTY is agreeing to never build the wall therefore never protect our borders, therefor never take control of the runaway illegal aliens swamping our country and destroying our economy, and nevver stopping the drug trade that far too many of our pioliticians seem to support and/or enjoy the benefits of. I DO NOT ANT the PARTY unified. i want it SMASHED! KAPUT! DESTROYED! Then, perhaps we can get back to being Americans instead of New World Order advocates.
Since you have seen the videos of The Donald where a woman supporter calls Cruz a pussyfooter, and Carson having a “pathological disease,” and tells the Mexicans who steal our jobs by taking our businesses to “go F**k themselves”; why do you seem to have such a negative and inaccurate explanation of them? I say you are being dogmatic and question how you get such interpretations of these events that are so out of line from what happened? You are not, God help you, believing the MSM spin of them? Are you?!
“Since you have seen the videos of The Donald where a woman supporter calls Cruz a pussyfooter”
So Trump didn’t repeat what his supporter said, but used the word “pussy” instead of “pussyfooter”?
It is a test to see if you interpret words with the intent to deceive or misguide people susceptible to double interpretations. I suspect you are misusing the meaning of “pussy” to spin an event in the most negative way you can. Look up the words, pusillanimous,pussyfooter and pussy. There is a common connection I want you to know about. This is an exercise of your open-minded, equivocal thinking.
Then, go your way with new knowledge, my FRiend.
No. When the woman yelled the word, “pussy” Donald was in the process of speaking. He stops and says,”she just said a terrible thing.” and wanted her to repeat it. It may have been “pussyfooter” and he wanted to know exactly what she said. So, the woman yells it out louder. When Trump verifies what he thought he heard, he says, “You are not allowed to say, and I never expect to hear that from you again! She said—and I never expect to hear that from you again—she said he’s a pussy!”
The word was “pussy.” You can tell Donald was amused, but had to show he does not like to use the word because of how people misuse and abuse its meaning. When you look at the definition, it is a derivation of the word “pussyfooter.” The woman could have said “pussyfooter” and meant the same thing. In fact, the origin of the word comes from the association of women to a cat. Women are cats, are they not?
Anyone can Say, and do say...” America First”....they always have. But what does that mean to the candidate when they say that???? What’s the stuff they’re made of to make such a claim and what is their History showing me they have stood and fought for this country .....
....America First can mean anything they want it to mean, especially if they’ve spent months knocking down this country, saying it sucks... like a real estate agent would buying property they want to buy at a cheap price so they can sell it for profit.....
You are really warped. This country is so screwed up right now it is way off the rails. if you can’t see it, then you haven’t been around very long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.