Posted on 02/04/2016 4:30:06 PM PST by springwater13
Not really. The legal definition of standing hasn't changed in the past few years. The plaintiff has to have suffered damages which are real and concrete, not theoretical. The defendant has to be the party responsible for those damages. And the court has to be in a position where they can redress the injury. It's something a judge can define on their own.
And obamacare is clearly and demonstrably unConstitutional. How far did that get us?
It’s wonderful to believe liberal dominated courts administer justice evenhandedly. In practice this is not what happens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.