Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is There Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton?
Townhall.com ^ | January 25, 2016 | Guy Benson

Posted on 01/25/2016 11:44:48 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
From the article

-- snip --

This is the same charge brought against Gen. David Petraeus for disclosing classified information in his personal notebooks to his biographer and mistress, who was herself an Army Reserve military intelligence officer cleared to see top secret information.

What General Petraeus did was at the most one tenth of what Hillary did, yet the Pentagon wants to take a star away from him

1 posted on 01/25/2016 11:44:48 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

TONS of EVIDENCE.....

ZERO POLITICAL WILL....

As long as Hillary is running for president as the “inevitable democrat” she is safe...

If Bernie Takes her down New Hampshire and Iowa, she may very well finally be put in jail...


2 posted on 01/25/2016 11:48:01 AM PST by GraceG (The election doesn't pick the next president, it is an audition for "American Emperor"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If the DOJ refuses to indict Clinton, the FBI and the intelligence community will leak the details to the press.

Guaranteed.


3 posted on 01/25/2016 11:48:01 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is There Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton?

Yes. The very nature of what she's done is criminal on its face. A private in the Army would have been in Leavenworth a year ago.

4 posted on 01/25/2016 11:50:02 AM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The rules in our SCIF at Fort Huachuca wouldn’t even allow ANY removable media to leave the SCIF without a two-man rule controlled operation supervised by the SSO, and then the media had to leave wrapped properly for classified courier deliver. This was after Manning used a re-writable disk that looked like a music CD to get his material out of a SCIF. So what Clinton’s folks did should get them ALL a cell next to Aldrich Ames.


5 posted on 01/25/2016 11:50:45 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is There Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton?

You mean that hasn't been deleted, hidden or altered?

6 posted on 01/25/2016 11:52:43 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (My Forefathers Would Be Shooting By Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“a good DA can indict a ham sandwich”

Hillary is the whole hog, with trimmings.


7 posted on 01/25/2016 11:58:37 AM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first ande then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

You’re absolutely right. I had a TS/SCI clearance for 20+ years, and if I’d broken ANY of the laws Hillary has, I’d still be in jail with a dishonorable discharge and a felony conviction. There’s no doubt Hillary should be indicted; the only question is whether the Obama administration will allow it. It would guarantee a Republican presidential victory this year, and the last thing Zero wants is a threat to Obamanoncare and his other “legacy” programs. On the other hand, it’s well known that the Obamas and Clintons hate each other, and he may be just petulant and malicious enough to throw her to the wolves. As narcissistic as he is, he may think his programs will survive a Republican president.


8 posted on 01/25/2016 11:58:54 AM PST by American Quilter (Carson/Cruz in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I hope the do, but most of the press will probably ignore it though.


9 posted on 01/25/2016 12:02:44 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Good thing there is no statute of limitations of espionage. However, Obama could pardon her and all her people, but I don’t think he actually likes her enough to do that.


10 posted on 01/25/2016 12:05:54 PM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

I would rather have the indictment after she wins the nomination


11 posted on 01/25/2016 12:06:02 PM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Because she is such a “public” figure, the standard of evidence needed will be higher for her than usual. Rather than having the standard 80-95% chance of a conviction, they will want a 95% - 100% chance that the evidence would support a conviction.

That said, it would probably be impossible to find a jury of all 12 people to convict her, but that does not matter.

The evidence released in the indictment, or by the FBI agents if the indictment is killed by DOJ will be so damning, she will have to step aside.

Right now, they are working two major lines of inquiry:

1: Creating a timeline of how $ to the Clinton Foundation created benefits from USGOV to donor, and

2: Trying to find a victim of her emails. Find someone who was killed or hurt because she did not secure HUMINT. Insecure emails can be minimized. Dead people cannot.


12 posted on 01/25/2016 12:12:57 PM PST by The All Knowing All Seeing Oz (I carry a handgun because even a small police officer is too big and heavy to carry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It seems likely, with all this elaborate maneuvering and migration, the information was put on a home brew server with intent to make it available to whomever knew enough to back in and access it.


13 posted on 01/25/2016 12:18:12 PM PST by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

keyboard spew alert


14 posted on 01/25/2016 12:24:58 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
If the DOJ refuses to indict Clinton, the FBI and the intelligence community will leak the details to the press.

Perhaps but if the emperor does not want to indict he will not indict.

15 posted on 01/25/2016 12:32:42 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

I remember when I worked at a classified facility in the early 80’s and the local paper did a write-up on us. Well anyone taking that paper with the article into work had to have a coversheet attached to it once it entered the building. Then you could not remove the article from the facility. LOL!


16 posted on 01/25/2016 12:37:40 PM PST by Herosmith ("Hindsight alone is not wisdom, And second-guessing is not a strategy." - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is There Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton?

Evidence does not count in the Clinton Crime Family. We need the rough equivalent of semen on a blue dress, except in this case, the semen cannot be viewed since no one has the security clearance to test the semen much less acknowledge that the semen exists. So, the semen is simply the result of action from a leak and the vicious VRWC. Nothing to see here, ready the coronation, and seat the most corrupt President in the history of the nation.

17 posted on 01/25/2016 12:52:16 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

The Hildebeast continues her arrogant nose-thumbing at the American people. She’s guilty. She knows it. She’s counting on Zero to pardon her of any and all wrongdoing.

I will only say this. If I had done a tenth...a hundredth...a thousandth of what she has done, relative to those emails, I would STILL be making gravel in Kansas.

She should never see the light of day as a free woman, IMO.


18 posted on 01/25/2016 1:13:34 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Looks like this was an espionage/bribery operation with info in return for money.

The Clintons first did this under Slick with nuclear secrets. They left them lying around, unsecured, at Oak Ridge and other places. Then they allowed Red Chinese nationals into the facilities where the secrets could just be picked up, with neither having direct contact and lower level types left on the hook. Lots of money, in the course of things, went to the DNC and the Clintons and they walked.

Fast forward to 2009 and they decided to go digital. Classification markings were stripped from totally classified documents and those stripped documents went on her highly hackable private server. Then, miracle of miracles, the Chinese, Russians, AQ, and whoever else were somehow informed where the treasure trove was, with subsequent hostile hacking assured. Also, and entirely by innocent coincidence, the Clintons were raking in tens of millions of dollars through speaking fees and contributions to their various “charities.”

19 posted on 01/25/2016 1:18:46 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahithophel

You’ve got it!


20 posted on 01/25/2016 1:20:31 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson