Skip to comments.
Donald Trump Ramps Up Attacks on Ted Cruz’s Eligibility
NY Times ^
| 1/9/16
| Trip Gabriel and Matt Flegenheimer
Posted on 01/09/2016 8:42:14 PM PST by randita
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-492 last
To: Cold Heat
You really have no clue. Now sitting during drafting of the Constitution.
To: bushpilot2
Founders used Vattel to justify combining the Colonies, their revolution, and was used help them draft the Constitution.
Several of the Bill of Rights comes from Vattel.
I erred on the 1775 date and drafting Constitution. Typing.
There’s chapter in Vattel devoted to forming a Constitution.
To: Cboldt
Read a few days ago there were ‘antenatus’ citizens.
To: bushpilot2
I did not say they did not read or use the book.
What I said was that they did not use it to write that amendment.
What I said was that it’s you who has no clue as to the interpretation then and now.
To: Cboldt
Anyone serving their country in uniform can not be held to have quitted their country and their allegiance to that country. The only way a child born of someone serving in the military abroad is of that person who is serving married a foreigner while in a foreign country. Otherwise, according to the law, a child born to 2 US citizen parents while in service to their country abroad, that child IS a natural born citizen and anyone who says otherwise and NOT done their due diligence. And this is why McCain was eligible, it had nothing to do with where he was born but everything to do with who he was born to.
485
posted on
01/13/2016 5:53:42 PM PST
by
patlin
("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
To: TomasUSMC
"Legal gibberish" you say ?
Not at all !
"Too bad ... we can't find ONE person who WAS BORN HERE with TWO PARENTS who were born HERE!
Because that would definitely be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, ... there are others running for President of the United States ...
I bet one of them is Donald Trump.
It IS SIMPLE. Just look up the DEFINITION GIVEN TO US BY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS on the 1790 Act.
The Definition was clarified by our FOUNDING FATHERS in the 1790 Act.
And it was reinstated by the Act in 1802.
So, take it up with the Supreme Court of the United States and our Founding Fathers.
In 1798, the law on naturalization was changed again.
The Federalists feared that many new immigrants favored their political foes, the Democratic-Republicans.
The Federalists, therefore, wanted to reduce the political influence of immigrants.
To do so, the Federalists, who controlled Congress, passed a lawthat required immigrants to wait fourteen years before becoming naturalized citizens and thereby gaining the right to vote.
The 1798 act also barred naturalization for citizens of countries at war with the United States.
At the time, the United States was engaged in an unofficial, undeclared naval war with France.
The French government thought the United States had taken the side of Britain in the ongoing conflict between Britain and France.
A related law passed in 1798, the Alien Enemy Act, gave the president the power during a time of war to arrest or deport any alien thought to be a danger to the government.
After Jefferson became president (in 1801), the 1798 naturalization law was repealed, or overturned (in 1802).
The basic provisions of the original 1790 law WERE RESTORED except for the period of residency before naturalization.The residency requirement, that is, the amount of time the immigrant had to reside, or live, in the United States, was put back to five years, as it had been in 1795.
The 1802 law remained the basic naturalization act until 1906, with two notable exceptions.In 1855, the wives of American citizens were automatically granted citizenship.
In 1870, people of African descent could become naturalized citizens, in line with constitutional amendments passed after the American Civil War (1861-65)that banned slavery and gave African American men the right to vote.
Other laws were passed to limit the number of people (if any) allowed to enter the United States from different countries,especially Asian countries, but these laws did not affect limits on naturalization.
Within a decade of adopting the Constitution, immigration, and naturalization in particular, had become hot political issues.
They have remained political issues for more than two centuries.
1st United States Congress, 21-26 Senators and 59-65 Representatives
TED CRUZ is by far, the MOST CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE we've got !
FACT: Cruzs fathers Cuban nationality at the time of Cruzs birth, is irrelevant, according to the law at that time,
just so long as he was a LEGAL Immigrant at the time of Ted Cruz's birth,
AND both of Ted Cruz's parents were legally married to each other.
What are the rules for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986?
The 14th Amendment IS a part of the U.S. Constitution and states in SECTION 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
So, under that power to legislate, Congress legislated and the President signed into law: When ONE parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national,the US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child,with five of the years after the age of 14.
... While there were initially rules regarding what the child must do to retain citizenship,amendments since 1952 HAVE ELIMINATED THESE REQUIREMENTS.
When Ted Cruz was born, his parents were "IN WEDLOCK".
They married, moved to Calgary, Alberta, and in late 1970 had their first and only child, Rafael Edward Cruz.
Cruz was born on December 22, 1970 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada where his parents, Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh Wilson and Rafael Bienvenido Cruz.
Cruz's mother was born and raised in Wilmington, Delaware, in a family of three quarters Irish and one quarter Italian descent.
Eleanor Darragh, mother of Ted Cruz, was raised in Delaware, graduated from a Catholic High School (1952) in the U.S., as well as Rice University (1956),so clearly she meets the residency requirements.
Source
In 1957, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz (Ted Cruz's father) decided to get out of Cuba by applying to the University of Texas.
Upon being admitted, he adds, he got a four-year student visa at the U.S. Consulate in Havana.
"Since he liked to eat seven days a week, he worked seven days a week, and he paid his way through the University of Texas," Ted Cruz says of his father, "and then ended up getting a job and eventually going on to start a small business and to work towards the American dream."
Only he did that in Canada, where Ted was born.
His father went there after having earlier obtained political asylum in the U.S. when his student visa ran out.
He then got a green card, he says, and married Ted's mother, an American citizen.
The two of them moved to Canada to work in the oil industry.
"I worked in Canada for eight years," Rafael Cruz says. "And while I was in Canada, I became a Canadian citizen."
The elder Cruz says he renounced his Canadian citizenship when he finally became a U.S. citizen in 2005 48 years after leaving Cuba.
Why did he take so long to do it?"I don't know. I guess laziness, or I don't know," he says.
So there is the law for the time Ted Cruz was born,
AND HOW
Ted Cruz's PARENTS fulfilled ALL those requirements of the law that time,
for Ted Cruz to be a "Natural Born Citizen".
Ted Cruz did NOT NEED a Court and a Judge to "Nationalize" him.
Senator Cruz became a U.S. citizen at birth, and he never had to go through a naturalization process after birth to become a U.S. citizen, said spokeswoman Catherine Frazier.
... The U.S. Constitution allows only a natural born American citizen to serve as president.
Most legal scholars who have studied the question agree that includes an American born overseas to an American parent, such as Cruz.
486
posted on
01/13/2016 5:55:18 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Cold Heat
Thankfully we have no need to request any money back from the IRS because no one files any of those pesky information forms with my name or my spouses name claiming that our little business has anything to do with federal government related activities. All our business careers we were the ones who ignorantly reported ourselves and when we discovered the truth, we quit reporting to the IRS that which we were not required to and they have left us alone for over 10 yrs now even though they know we are still in business because of all the other taxes we are required to pay such as 2290 highway use tax and the unified carrier registration fee we are required to file and pay annually.
“One way to know the value of something is by the effort made to protect it”
Have a nice evening
487
posted on
01/13/2016 6:01:08 PM PST
by
patlin
("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
To: Cboldt
I was chatting with a lawyer the other day on this matter and he predicted that one day a US citizen baby born abroad adopted by a US citizen couple, might run for president a cause quite a stir.
To: Cold Heat
The constitution will be amended to allow naturalized citizens to hold the office. The next phase will be whether nationals (aka "almost citizens") can hold the office.
Think of all the saved time, no more arguing over the meaning of NBC, native-born, Vattel, and all that old, dead, white guy garbage.
489
posted on
01/13/2016 6:32:43 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Yosemitest
Thanks for all the information. And Cruz is a great American.
I still prefer someone born in the U.S.A. Raised by two parents born in the USA. A President should be born in the Country he will lead....... Thats just....well......
Natural.
490
posted on
01/13/2016 8:54:26 PM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
To: TomasUSMC
And your choice IS ? ? ?
I certainly hope it is NOT a SOCIALIST, like one who LOVES "EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" !
491
posted on
01/13/2016 9:53:16 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: TomasUSMC
ARE YOU REFUSING the definition of
"natural born citizen" CLEARLY DEFINED by our FOUNDING FATHERS ?
It was defined
for the United States, BY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS !
The Naturalization Act of 1790, let's read it
!
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled,That any Alien being a free white person,who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years,
may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the Stateswherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least,
and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court thathe is a person of good character,
and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by lawto support the Constitution of the United States,
which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer,
and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon;
and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States.
And the children of such person so naturalized,dwelling within the United States,
being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization,
shall also be considered as citizens of the United States.
And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States,shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, thatthe right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States:
Provided also, thatno person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid,except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.
As the article
U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues: A Documentary History The men who drafted the U.S. Constitution in the summer of 1788 realized that citizenship was bound to become an issue.
...Consequently,
Article I, Section 8 of the new Constitution listed the powers given to the new Congress.
The third item on the list was the power to
"establish a uniform rule of naturalization ... throughout the United States." A year after the Constitution was adopted, Congress passed the first law that established a
"uniform rule of naturalization": The Act of March 26, 1790.
The act was just
the first in a series of laws addressing the issue of naturalization, ...
In January 1795, the act of 1790 was repealed and replaced by another law. ...
In 1798, the law on naturalization was changed again. ...
After Jefferson became president (in 1801),
the 1798 naturalization law was repealed, or overturned (in 1802).
The basic provisions of the original 1790 law WERE RESTORED except for the period of residency before naturalization.
The residency requirement, that is, the amount of time the immigrant had to reside, or live, in the United States, was put back to five years, as it had been in 1795.
The 1802 law remained the basic naturalization act until 1906, with two notable exceptions.
In 1855, the wives of American citizens were automatically granted citizenship.
In 1870, people of African descent could become naturalized citizens, in line with constitutional amendments passed after the American Civil War (1861â65) that banned slavery and gave African American men the right to vote.
Other laws were passed to limit the number of people (if any) allowed to enter the United States from different countries, especially Asian countries,
but these laws did not affect limits on naturalization. Remember:
Ted Cruz's PARENTS fulfilled ALL those requirements of the law that time, for Ted Cruz to be a "Natural Born Citizen".
Ted Cruz did NOT NEED a Court and a Judge to "Nationalize" him.
Senator Cruz became a U.S. citizen at birth, and he never had to go through a naturalization process after birth to become a U.S. citizen, said spokeswoman Catherine Frazier.
... The U.S. Constitution allows only a natural born American citizen to serve as president.
Most legal scholars who have studied the question agree that includes an American born overseas to an American parent, such as Cruz.
Now, YOU either respect the LAW AS WRITTEN ,
492
posted on
01/13/2016 10:32:33 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-492 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson