Posted on 11/21/2015 11:25:23 AM PST by RoosterRedux
There is a reason we’re known as the “Stupid Party”.
“(.......if you follow me, lol)”.
I follow you. There is nothing fair and balanced about Megan Kelly. She has been after Trump since before the first debate. I remember her talking with other Fox people on how to handle Trump in preparing for the first debate. Now we know for sure what she was talking about.
Once again Prince Reibus fails his job as RNC chairman. Get rid of his a$$ just like we need to get rid of Obama. Why the crap would he agree to CNN debate after the disgraceful CNBC debate? Did he already find a way to renegotiate the CNBC debate after all? I know OAN news is trying to appeal to Prince Reibus to host the Republican debate but I am guessing Rinse Repeatus won’t have any of that considering they are the only conservative news network.
Yes, it is fraudulent. But does it matter? The media will not cover it! They only report on fraud that doesn't involve them.
I’d like to see him stop “Unloading’ and get down to brass tacks. A debate is a debate and a rally a rally...he doesn’t seem to discern the two.
Re: “What exactly does CNN have to do in order to lose its right to depose these candidates for two hours in front of the whole world?”
Stupid question.
We can sponsor our own debates by running 5 minutes of ads every half hour.
Then we have two choices:
(1) We can put all our debates up for competitive network bidding - for a competitive payment and for a competitive format and time slot.
(2) Or, we can purchase an optimal 2 hour block of network time, and use the ad revenue to pay for it.
Why are Republicans so weak, and so unimaginative, that we think we must bow to network demands?
Pathetic!
It’s the same pathetic story we hear every four years about Democrats voting in our presidential primaries.
If we pay for our own primaries - instead of making state taxpayers pay for them - we can exclude any voter we want to exclude.
Once again - pathetic weakness, and pathetic lack of imagination.
Trump’s not that patient. He’ll unload on CNN well before the debate. And it will be helpful for him to illustrate his point by playing the edited and unedited clips.
My book website is www.gpsdeclassified.com
“yet another lying log on the left-wing garbage fire”
Metaphor mashup on aisle 6!
I thought I’d ping you. It looks like another instance of the MSM BS’ing. You can’t trust the GOPE Washington Examiner, et al, or much of any in the press especially from here on out.
{”He’s now got the leverage. CNN really screwed up big time.”}
This is a man who knows how to use leverage.
I encourage everyone who tweets to do the same.
Thank you for the ping. It is getting more and more blatant isn’t it? Anything to take down Trump.
If Trump said no cnn debate for him, they would have to make amends or have the debate short of the headliner and lose money. If more than Trump also said NO, cnn wouldn’t be able to have any debate and really lose big money.
Am suspecting that someone at cnn is being prepped for execution.
He should do both. Or only attend the debate if the apology if on air, at the beginning of the debate.
They need him much more than he needs to be there.
Ping this. Maybe, send it to Charles Cooke?
I mean, who knew? A scorched earth LLS forms against Trump?
Media, and GOP, all comply with it?
Thought you will want to know of this, to keep the FR record pristine and in real context.
Yes, an election it. If Trump says no debate with CNN, it would be over.
No. This is right out of the just reported TRUMP CARD, LLC, playbook, newly formulated to take TRUMP down before Iowa/NH caucus and primary.
They have 69 days. The LLC was reported yesterday, on the same day it began the false narrative between Trump and some NBC reporter.
This battle will be epic. It begins.
Just why does Trump need to get down into details? Seriously, what is wrong with generalities?
There is only one channel that is a little to the right and that is fox news which conservatives hated so what do you expect?
I guess they could debate on EWTN......would that satisfy you? There are so other channels. We own radio so I guess they could do a radio debate but would that be better? Probably not. So most intelligent one. What is your proposal? I can’t wait to hear this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.