Where is this “fundamental commitment” enshrined? I’ve scoured the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and a host of the nation’s other framing documents and I don’t find any such language in any of them. When did we take on the obligation of providing succor to every pest-ridden dust-monger who was unhappy in his third-world hovel?
To hell with them. Let someone else be the world’s daycare. We owe them nothing.
“This country must not give into fear or bias by turning its back on our nation’s fundamental commitment to refugee protection and human rights,”
How about using a little common sense, you idiot. If you’re that concerned, take them into YOUR home, YOUR neighborhood, YOR city. And stay the hell out of mine.
New Hampshire must have the only Democrat governor with any sense.
Ah yes . . . fighting “bias.” The number one Jewish priority since the Book of Joshua [/sarcasm].
How strange? Israel defends her borders, builds walls, aggressively deports illegal immigrants and doesn't take refugees from Islamic states. You would think they would be a model for the ADL.
Yet America is ridiculed for even considering doing any of these things.
Sure seems like a double standard. I really like Israel, and talk to my Israeli friend on Facebook all the time. Israel has moved to the position that it must remain a Jewish ethno-state.
Something like that is needed here, and was in place until the 1965 immigration reform act. 1965 Immigration Reform: Anatomy of a Disaster"
Not only has the bill failed in its stated purpose, it has realized many of its critics' worst nightmares. Concern mounted that this bill would radically change the ethnic composition of the United States. Such things were still considered legitimate concerns in 1965, in the same Congress that had just passed the key civil rights legislation of the 1960's.The disaster is all around us. Everything we were promised would not happen has.Specific influx predictions that were made seem tragicomic today. Senator Robert Kennedy predicted a total of 5,000 immigrants from India; his successor as Attorney General, Nicholas Katzenbach, foresaw a meager 8,000. Actual immigration from India has exceeded by 1,000-times Robert Kennedy's prediction.
These results were unforeseen by liberals easily led about by their emotions. Others were not so blind. Jewish organizations had labored since 1924 to unweave national origins quotas by admitting family members on non-quota visas. The B'nai B'rith Women and the American Council for Judaism Philanthropic Fund, among other Jewish organizations, supported this reform legislation while it was yet in subcommittee in the winter of 1965. Roman Catholics had the twin motivations of still-evolving social justice doctrine and the potential windfall of a mass influx of co-religionists from Latin America. Other organized minorities pressured for increased immigration to benefit relatives in their homelands. The ultra-liberal Americans for Democratic Action, the ACLU and the National Lawyers Guild joined the chorus. Further, the Communist Party USA supported higher immigration on the grounds that it destabilizes working Americans.
The ONLY time the DEMS/Leftists adhere to the Constitution is when it furthers their goals/ideals.
Bring up sanctuary cities, SS/Welfare vs. 5th, 9th/10th. Show them their hypocrisy and they still will emotionally attack.
How would they feel if we knowingly let in Nazi War Criminals?
I’ll take your comments into consideration when you call on Israel to take them in, too. Jihadis want the goyim dead also, you know.
Do these Jews have a death wish? One fact about these invaders - they are all anti-Jewish.
Sucks to be the ADL today. LOL!
The Soros run ADL wants Jews in America to be subject to the terror of Malmostan
ADL, are you ready to open your homes to the horde? Bacon for breakfast?
LEGAL immigrants.
Mr Greenblatt’s neighborhood needs to be first to be filled with these ... ah, “refugees.” There is certainly room for 50 or so refugees at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC.