So the only photographic evidence presented by the activists of the Poopstika was actually a photo that was at least a year old.
So....how did this become such an issue? Seems like the person who claimed to see it would be the first suspect in this hoax. Was it that crazy woman on the video telling the reporters to get out?
These things are nearly always hoaxes or done by the other side.
No aficionado of the swastika would render it in feces. That would be like a Muslim pissing on the Koran.
It’s important to let the public know that this school’s president and chancellor resigned “not because of anything they did, but because they were weak men, unable to stand up against fascism.”
University administrators have been known as weaklings since the late 1960s. However, those who recruit them only care about their ability to fund-raise for the university. This needs to change.
Instead, when someone is recruited to be a university president or chancellor, it must be made clear to them that they must *both* fund raise *and* have the intestinal fortitude to stand up against radical agitators and fascists.
The best test for them would be to recruit a radical feminist fascist to rant at them to their face, blaming them for everything wrong with the world and cursing them for who them are, with a stream on unrestricted bigotry and bile.
Only if the candidate lasts through that without soiling himself, crying, or otherwise showing weakness, is he offered the job.
They ought to ask the custodian of the residence hall. Someone had to clean it up, and I find it difficult to believe that in this age of instant cell-phone photography some "outraged" student wouldn't have gotten a shot of it, or that, "poop" being what it is, a permanent stain wasn't left on the wall.
Whatever the case, something involving shit occurred, and I doubt it was a swastika.
And here’s what I’ve heard of the other two ‘racist’ incidents.
1. A black student was walking on the campus and heard someone shout the ‘N’ word. He saw no one, and wasn’t positive where it came from.
2. The other case, some guy shouted the ‘N’ word from a pickup that drove past a gathering of a black student organization.
And then the swastika incident. These are the three incidents that led to all the protests and apparent demands that the entire 35,000 student campus be subjected to some sort of ‘sensitivity’ training, the one guy’s supposed hunger strike, and that eventually led to the president’s resignation.
Has anyone heard any more details about these, or other incidents that were used to justify all the uproar at Missouri?
Yeah... but..... somebody did drop an open bag of cotton balls somewhere on the campus.... in 2010.
As you can see, lives were shattered. Only the strongest recovered. It was soooo bad it took 5 years for them to even bring it up.
Since when is a Poopstika racist?
Are they black jews?
I think a poop swastika would be aimed at all the Nazis and white supremacists on campus.
What should be discussed is how the administrators of this school let the animals get out of control.
Anyone at that school that is serious about their education is getting screwed out of it.
Students have the right to march and wave signs but the instant a student uses force on another student or on any person on the grounds who has a right to be there and who is himself obeying the law and the rules of civilized conduct, should be expelled from the school immediately and with instructions that any appearance on the grounds will be trespassing.
So you can 100 students. Good. That means the rest can get their education.
The odds about a million to one that it was a hoax, as almost always.
Even if true, the NAZI’s aka as Democrat Socialists, were Jew haters.
Hoax? Does a bear shit in the woods? (or crap on a university wall)
Bookmark
How many times have we heard these lies?
“
Did this incident occur as reported, or was it an immaculate defecation that formed the foundation of an unimaginable deception?”
Another mystery like no picture of the race baiters in Berkley.
These University Leftists deserved to lose their jobs because they were unable to counter the nonsense they have been complicit in teaching.
They were simply incapable of explaining that the concepts they promote such as “systemic racism” and “white privilege” are complete frauds which are incompatible with real life tangible things such as evidence and facts.
What actions were these Administrators actually suppose to have take against phantoms? Had they expelled and innocent without evidence their would be damages for that. They were simply unwilling to explain that their own race theories they promote are frauds.
good opening sentence considering the subject matter...
good opening sentence considering the subject matter...