Posted on 10/11/2015 4:55:02 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
He had the last word and he blew it.
;)
You’re tightening down those 10 items to many conservatives want ..... what is disturbing, who will sign on to the 10 as written? Bueller? Bueller? Anybody?
No normal person will watch the Dem debate. I, however, plan to watch it out of curiousity and I predict many here will do that also.
Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb, Lincoln Chafee & possibly, Joe Biden??? Not the most exciting group of folks!!! We shall see!!! As I said in another post...I will not be watching this farce and laugh-in!!! IMHO....just more “Obama, Hope & Change”.....for the worse!!!
I don’t know enough about who could win or who couldn’t to predict. I just know that the line is out on Paul Ryan that he’s very weak on immigration which is a huge no-no for us.
Most polls are BS.
Think about it; if you were a true conservative, constitutionalist, would you answer the phone for a poll or hang up? I hang up. There are MANY, MANY like me who are voting for Cruz, 2nd choice Carson, 3rd choice Trump who won’t answer or simply don’t trust their poll to trace me and hurt me. (hurt as in government hurt me)
I’m probably a bit idealistic about the speaker ship but I think if we don’t get a speaker who is conservative with those values we are selling out to the GOPe. I don’t want to do that.
They already have the “live” tape touting 30 mil viewers in the can.
Remember, they have to do something with their money and usually it produces wealth for the country and sometimes even jobs. So I really don't see the down side with the wealthy getting richer. For example I know of a rich family in Key West that owns everything there is to own. What does he do with his money? He buys assets that require other people to work for him. He produces jobs,creates wealth, a tax base, I just don't see the down side. Only a jealous side.
Good question.
Thanks for the link, AB! Does Sharyl Atkinson’s show publish a program of topics/interviews? Or is she “spontaneous” like Rush?
World War 1 ended, and the Soldiers came home. The USA entered a deep Depression.
From what I have read, Harding got sick (?) and did not do much outside of reducing taxes and slashing spending.
The Economy turned around and rebounded by 1921. War Debts were paid off.
Different times demand different plans, but the Harding framework could work under a new POTUS
No question.
I’d be happy with Newt as Speaker.
Hey!
It could have been worse, like bagpipes and banjo.
Just heard Chaffetz on abc with the ditzy broad who was eating him up and he was letting her! Really disgusting. He should have kicked her ass and didn’t do a thing. What a putz.
Governments had the Spanish Flu Epidemic to contend with that killed tens of millions of mainly young adults. That is Mother Nature's Anti Economic Growth Policy.
http://history1900s.about.com/od/1910s/p/spanishflu.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140428-1918-flu-avian-swine-science-health-science/
Never mind that Hillary is disintegrating in the polls and is due to chat with Trey Gowdy soon. Forget all that, barely mentioned.
F.Chuck does a half hour interview with Bernie the commie,its just goes down-hill from there.
If you are not a Liberal at 18, you have no heart, if you are still a liberal at 30, you have no head.
Who knows if Trump is the answer or not? But, he doesn’t let ditzy reporters chew him up and he doesn’t cower under journalistic pressure like most do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.