Skip to comments.
DEMOCRATS PANIC IN RESPONSE TO DONALD TRUMP’S IMMIGRATION PLAN
Breitbart ^
| August 15, 2014
| MATTHEW BOYLE
Posted on 08/16/2015 2:45:22 PM PDT by Hojczyk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
1
posted on
08/16/2015 2:45:22 PM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
2
posted on
08/16/2015 2:48:52 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
(Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
To: Hojczyk
The firestorm starts. Don’t go wobbly on us Donald.
3
posted on
08/16/2015 2:50:10 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: Hojczyk
Their panic now will be nothing compared to the day Trump is sworn in as President.
To: Hojczyk
I like this plan. This is not re-arranging the deckchairs on the Titanic.It’s game changing!
Freegards
LEX
To: Hojczyk
The butt hurt is overflowing from every where.
6
posted on
08/16/2015 2:52:00 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
(Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
To: Hojczyk
Should stop treating them as “second-class citizens”?
They aren’t American citizens at all!
To: Hojczyk
Hang tough Mr. Trump.
The Dems and Rinos are simply wetting their panties/briefs.
8
posted on
08/16/2015 2:56:05 PM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Hojczyk
Not every foreign born person here is a "hardworking immigrant" any more than every native born person is "hardworking."
Some of both sets are criminals, drones and jag-offs. There tends to be a disproportion number of these types among illegal immigrants and those who didn't earn their citizenship as evidenced by the disproportionate numbers of them in our prison system.
9
posted on
08/16/2015 3:00:12 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Hojczyk
And more than a few republCrats too.
10
posted on
08/16/2015 3:04:57 PM PDT
by
nomad
To: kabar
Donald’s mothers name was Mary MacLeod.
As I understand it, MacLeod means ‘stand firm’.
I don’t think he’s going to be going wobbly. It’s not in his blood.
11
posted on
08/16/2015 3:13:33 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
To: Hojczyk
There is something wrong with the rating system that give Rubio 80%.
12
posted on
08/16/2015 3:14:10 PM PDT
by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: Hojczyk
The GOP should quit treating these families as second class citizens and join democrats [sic] who support immigrant families and want to keep them together.Senor Manriquez, si esos son migrantes illegales, como pueden a ser llamado ciudanos? (Translated into English for my fellow Freepers; Mr Manriquez, if they are illegal immigrants, how can they be called citizen?)
Short answer, they aren't...
the infowarrior
To: Hojczyk
A good plan accomplishes objectives and is realistic. This plan is all of the above.
14
posted on
08/16/2015 3:18:35 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: Hojczyk
15
posted on
08/16/2015 3:18:42 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Balding_Eagle
It is going to get very bumpy very soon. It could also get violent. Look for the rent a mobs to try to disrupt his campaign rallies. The MSM and some of his GOP opponents will attack him. And Hillary will pounce. The Dems understand the threat this poses to their plan to become the permanent majority party.
16
posted on
08/16/2015 3:19:21 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: Hojczyk
How many Republicans are going into panic mode?
17
posted on
08/16/2015 3:20:45 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Hojczyk
George Will is a DemocRAT who got SO OFFENDED by the DemocRATS, that he couldn't tolerate being associated with all those "CRAZIES" .
Now for a deeper understanding of just WHO George Will IS:
The word "neocons" is ONLY used by LIBERALS, trying to insult Conservatives.
The is no such thing as a "NEW" Conservative.
Conservatives ARE Conservative, plain and simple.
But read this"Liberals, Conservatives, and Neocons Learn the Difference!
March 12, 2014
Almost everybody is confused about the word "neoconservative" and its shortened form, "neocon."
I find that liberals/Democrats seem to use it as a sort of disrespectful form of "conservative,"and probably have no idea the the words have distinct meanings.
On the other hand, I know of some conservatives who define it as "new conservatives,"meaning people who were formerly something else, but have converted to conservatism.
Both are wrong.
As near as I can tell, "neo-" doesn't apply to any other word that way formerly not X, but having become X.
No, "neo-" almost always refers to an ideology that is different from the root word in a significant way.Neoconfederates are not people who want to secede and become a separate country.
They want the ideals of the Confederacy to be applied to modern politics, more or less, but not all of them.
Neoliberal is a more vague term,but it specifically applies to people who may have SOME of the attributes of liberals,
but who contradict liberalism in their advocacy of free trade and privatization
and other ideas usually thought of as conservative.
And, finally, neoconservatives are mostly those moderate cold war LIBERALS who defected to the Republican party when the Democrats got totally flaky with McGovern and his ilk.
Their ultimate origin, however, is not the Democratic party but the Trotskyite movement.
Jack Kerwick elaborates.
Read this: Most "Conservatives" Are Secretly Neoconservatives
12 March, 2014, by Jack Kerwick, Ph.D.
A colleague of mine has drawn my attention to a Washington Post blog post Why Most Conservatives Are Secretly Liberals by a Professor John Sides, a political scientist at Georgetown University.
Sides agrees with fellow political scientists Christopher Ellis and James Stimson, co-authors of Ideology in America.
Ellis and Stimson CONTEND thatAmerica is, at bottom, a center-left nation,
for while 30 percent of self-described liberals are consistent in endorsing liberal policy prescriptions,
the same sort of consistency can be ascribed to only 15 percent of conservatives.
And another 30 percent of conservatives actually advance liberal positions.
In short, Americans may TALK the talk of conservatism, but they WALK the walk of liberalism.
That is, they favor Big Government.
Sides, Ellis, and Stimson, it seems clear to me, are liberals.
It doesnt require much reading between the lines to discern this.
That they associate liberals, and liberals ALONE, with such virtues as consistency and such lofty ideals as a cleaner environment and a stronger safety net is enough to bear this out.
Yet in peddling the ridiculous, patently absurd notion thatconservatives see the media as PROMOTING conservatism,
the verdict regarding their liberalism is seen for the NO-BRAINER that it is.
There is, though, another CLUE that unveils Sides, Ellis, and Stimsons ideological PREJUDICES:They equate the term liberalism with a robust affirmation of Big Government.
They treat liberalism synonymously with its modern, Welfare-Statist incarnation.
There is no mention here of the fact that, originally, liberalism referred toa vision that attached supreme value to individual liberty,
a vision in which government played, and had to play, a minimal role in the lives of its citizens.
And there is no mention of the fact that, if liberalism is now an ugly word,
it is because the very same socialists who made socialism an ugly word hijacked liberalism when it enjoyed a favorable reception
and visited upon it the same fate that they secured for socialism.
In other words, if Sides himself wanted to be bluntly honest, hed have to admit that liberals are secretly socialists.
Still, though their premises are bogus, Sides and his colleagues draw the correct conclusion thatmost conservatives are NOTHING OF THE KIND.
The truth of the matter is thatthe vast majority of contemporary conservatives are neoconservatives.
Now, neoconservatism is a term that hasnt the best reputation.
It has ALWAYS BEEN CONTROVERSIAL,
and most of its proponents have DISAVOWED IT to the point of, preposterously, condemning it as an anti-Semitic SLUR.
But George W. Bush and his party inflicted potentially irrevocable damage upon the label.
Conservatism is a more marketable label.
Nevertheless, the reality is that neoconservatism is indeed a distinct school of political thought.
Beyond this, it is fundamentally different in kind from classical conservatism.
Irving Kristol, the so-called Godfather of neoconservatism, an appellation that he readily endorsed, ADMITS this in noting boththat neoconservatism exists
and that conservative can be misleading when used to describe it.
Neoconservatism, you see, is THE INVENTION OF LEFTISTS like Kristol himself.
When the Democratic Party began veering too far to the Left in the 1960s, Kristol and more moderate leftists began turning toward the Republican Party.
So as TO DISTINGUISH THEMSELVES FROM traditional conservatives, they coined the term neoconservatism.
Neoconservatives, Kristol asserts, are not at all hostile to the idea of a welfare state even if they reject the vast and energetic bureaucracies created by the Great Society.
Neoconservatives ENDORSE social security, unemployment insurance, and some kind of family assistance plan, among other measures.
But whats most interesting, particularly at a time when ObamaCare has DIVIDED the country, is that Kristol reminds us thatneoconservatives SUPPORT some form of national health insurance.
In all truthfulness, however, neither a degree in political science nor an IQ above four is required to know thatneoconservatism has always championed Big Government
for it is its foreign policy vision more than anything else that distinguishes it from its competitors.
For neoconservatives, America is exceptional in being, as Kristol puts it, a creedal nation,the only nation in all of human history to have been founded upon an ideology of equality, of natural rights.
The U.S.A., then, has a responsibility to promote this ideology throughout the world.
And it is by way of a potentially boundless military i.e. Big Government that this ideological patriotism is to be executed.
Had the foregoing political scientists been looking in the right places, they would BE FORCED TO CONCLUDE that most conservatives are secretly neoconservatives.
So, you see that those WHO THEY CALL "neoconservatives", are really nothing more than the old moderate side of the DemocRATS.
It's just THAT SIMPLE .
18
posted on
08/16/2015 3:21:27 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Hojczyk
Go, Trump. GO!!
Go, Cruz, GO!!
Open up a big can of RINO-B-Gone!!
19
posted on
08/16/2015 3:23:57 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: kabar
20
posted on
08/16/2015 3:25:51 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson