Posted on 08/08/2015 8:19:09 AM PDT by Clyde5445
Carly is the female version of Trump - she’s just more sneaky about it - which makes her more dangerous. If C.F. is such a great leader, then why did the share holders of Hewlett Packard give her the boot?
Also, I note that C.F. tries to skirt social issues ... Oh, yes, I anticipate the tired mantra of the libertarian wackos - “fiscally conservative, socially liberal” ... Anything goes with the immoral / amoral cadre of closet liberals, who have not the honesty to call themselves liberals. I’ll bet C.F. makes the libertarians all have screaming wet orgasms ... but the problem is that social liberalism (i.e.; moral degeneracy) costs money. However, the Paulbots, and perhaps those drooling over Carly, will never understand that substantial truth.
Is it just my imagination, or are all the most vehement anti-Trump Freepers those who have been here the longest? If so, then it leads me to think of them as the typical establishment types, those who see Trump as a threat because he does not play nice with others - especially gutless establishment eunuchs ... Of course Carly is a big girl, and if she thinks that Trump is being vulgar, wait until she mixes it up with the backroom skunks of the political stripe. Hint, Carly: They make your CEO “boardroom brawls” look like a Boy Scout jamboree. Suck it up - or GTFO!
Exactly! She is also struggling for someone to pay attention to her. I voted for her when she ran against Boxer, but I feel she ran a very poor campaign.
“Scott could get a name’.”
“Pussy” comes to mind.
Walker is about as exciting as overcooked spaghetti. He’s a “limp noodle” - and that’s being polite. He’d never be presidential material, because I guarantee you that, if Vlad Putin gave him the evil eye, Little boy Scotty would roll over and pant like a subservient puppy.
“... My mind stuck to her face.”
Ewww! Was it good for the both of you? LOL!
Among the most vocal critics of Trumps remarks, according to several people involved in the discussions, were two conservative media rising-stars, Townhalls Katie Pavlich and HotAirs Mary Katharine Ham, both Fox News contributors and employees of RedStates sister sites. Over texts and emails, they helped organize a push to disinvite Trump from the RedState Gathering, telling their colleagues they didnt want to be on a stage that also welcomed him. Erickson said he was already inclined to disinvite Trump once he saw the video, but he credited his female colleagues with influencing his decision.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3322752/posts
Too dignified to endure some typical mad Donald.
Well they COULD have taken into account the nonsense that the faux debate pushed on Donald. That was not a debate, that was WWE, and Megyn got the proverbial chair smashed over her head.
And so. The Enfant Terrible got a timeout. Looks like he’s none the worse for it.
That is an interesting scenario. What if it had to be Putin vs. the Trumpster. Vlad the Communist versus Donald the Capitalist.
That no nonsense New York boy might prove useful there. Just sayin.
There are other links out there and it has been discussed here on FR. It’s common knowledge, so don’t pretend that you didn’t know about it.
He had to ask his sons and the COC what they thought.
How many Trump businesses have gone bankrupt? Here in Tampa there was a major development with his name on it. They took deposits for condos but the thing will never be built.
The other 3,999,999,999 people on Facebook will miss ya.
You bring up a good point. Ironically, the same Trump supporters who say “well, we like Trump for now because he is bashing the RINO’s and Democrats (although he really isn’t) are the same ones now upset with Carly. Shouldn’t she be liked now for bashing Hillary? Doesn’t she serve a purpose too?
The answer is no, because she tried to hit the Donald and his people are going crazy. Like you said, BOTH are sneaky, but CF is actually beginning to show her Liberal side...Trump is covering his.
So, do you think that the Trump supporters are the same way?
With Trump’s ego, will he have a Czar of “taking down names”. That’s going to be a busy job and eventually you have a North Korean dictator type.
A thoughtful person might consider that those FReepers have been to the rodeo before and know a thing or two ... or three.
Not a Trump-et, but I would like to know why you think people donate big money to candidates, ever.
After working for a Congress-critter for a couple of years, I can tell you that when the Congressman has a couple dozen calls to return, the ones that have given him money move to the top of the pile. Money doesn’t buy you favors, it buys you access.
Right. He will burn out fast, like a 4th of July rocket.
Plus overexposure will turn the fickle populace against him.
I’ve been thinking that the “smartest guy in the room” would do well to give a non-response to this issue. You disappoint me, Scott.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.