Posted on 07/08/2015 8:48:19 AM PDT by fishtank
What you claim creationists did in this post was not true in my case. I too assumed the science that they taught me was sound. Only later in life and thanks to the internet did I find the tools to read for myself and question my ‘own’ worldview. The more I looked for that which agrees with the Bible the more evidence I found.
In today’s day in age it is more important which facts the mainstream chooses to emphasize and also which they choose to sweep under the rug.
Here’s another example. When I was married over 25 years ago my wife told me I probably needed to see a chiropractor. I thought ‘What? Who me... those quacks?!?!’ Then about 10 years ago and no where else to turn I saw a chiropractor - best ‘medicine’ I ever received for my whole body and handling stress.
Google Taylor vs AMA lawsuit if you want to see an example from 1972 of the heavy-handed way the press handles news.
Well I don’t have nearly the recall that I’d like Wilk vs AMA
But this chiropractic care is based on sound reasoning and logic as well as strong scientific conclusions yet the MD scientists that most revere are the reals quacks in society if they oppose this kind of care that first does no harm. No drugs no investigative surgery. These days folks think there are no more widespread ‘snake-oil’ salesmen...
http://chiro.org/wordpress/2012/03/13/wilk-v-ama-25-years-laterwhy-it-still-isnt-over/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.