LGBT Leaders: Gay Marriage Is Not Enough (Totalitarian System)

Daily Beast ^ | June 26, 2015 | Samantha Allen

[beethovenfan]

Soon the Christians will be taken out. Then the gays will rejoice - for a short time, until the tribulation (God’s wrath) begins.

[liberalism is suicide]

Hmmm...does that mean in order to meet future marriage quotas the government will make same sex “marriages” mandatory? Don’t be surprised if it happens. This government is capable of any evil.

[RichInOC]

It’s never, ever just the tip.

[Zeneta]

I was thinking along the lines of this;

Traditionally, the government has used the federal acquisition process as a tool to implement and further its programs and initiatives for social and economic change, and this trend continues.

There are several important initiatives that are intended to benefit businesses, particularly small business. These programs, which include incentive, set-aside, and preference programs, give small businesses and small businesses owned by special minority and disadvantaged groups advantages in bidding on federal contracts.

I would bet that 0bama will add people from the lgbtq..lmnop group to the list.

Set-Aside Programs

Federal agencies are required by law to spend 23% of their purchases with small businesses. These set- asides break down like this:

3% or more for service-disabled veteran-owned businesses

5% or more for veteran-owned small businesses

5% or more for 8(a) small businesses

5% or more for HUBZone businesses

3% or more for women-owned businesses

http://www.vetbizresourcecenter.com/certification/Set-Aside_Programs.html

[oldfart]

In the last days of 1941 Japan awoke a sleeping giant - to the dismay and sorrow of millions of its citizens. The Supreme court in the two decisions regarding gay marriage and Obamacare, may have done something equally stupid.

In the former case the people of the United States came together and fashioned an economy and war-machine that killed more Japanese citizens than their leaders could ever have imagined.

But the cost of the latter case to those who are celebrating their “victory” is yet to be totaled. While the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was an attempt to strip the people of the U.S. of their physical possessions, those two decisions are an attempt to strip a people of their consciences. It may be a long and costly campaign but I believe those recent court decisions will suffer a fate similar to that of the Japanese Empire. Time will tell if the judges that rendered those decisions will suffer a fate similar to Tojo and his sycophants.

We are standing at a perilous juncture in the affairs of men. Our economy is in shambles, every view to the future obscured by the effects of the seven deadly sins and even our personal ethics under attack from all sides. Is it too far-fetched to believe that men will turn against each other over the results of these two disastrous decisions? Is it absurd to consider that some - perhaps many - people will consider these decisions to be an attack on their long-held beliefs?

Many years ago legislators decided (for us) that this nation should give up all alcoholic beverages. Today we recognize that decision as stupid since it was ineffective, enabled the rise of a vast crime syndicate and spawned one of the most hated and least trusted federal agencies in existence (the BATFE.) One can only wonder what these more recent decisions will bring but I doubt it will be welcomed by the majority of Americans.

Personally, I believe it will bring massive bloodshed. Gays, government workers, law enforcement agents will all be targets of angry citizens. Of course, many of those angry citizens will fall too but there are many more of the latter than the former. The War for Southern Independence (mistakenly referred to as a Civil War) will pale as an example of bloody butchery.

God help us all

[longtermmemmory]

will scallia go public with his opinions and educate the public?

Will hi out kagen and Sotomayor?

[CaptainPhilFan]

(This is for the Mom’s Basement trolls who are reporting back to their cohorts. Yeah, the DUmmies have a thread going about the FReepers responses to gay marriage).

The only gay person I hate is a bitchy lesbian I shared desk space with. The other gays I know I either love or admire. My tenants who share my house are gay. Most of my gay friends HATE the Gay Mafia because you whack jobs make all gay people look bad.

So you’ve got the right to be married in all 50 states? Good for you. Now shut up and go away, eh? But NO, lots of you intend to go further, led by George Takei who said religious beliefs are the next target.

You’re going to start suing churches, pastors and congregations who don’t support your lifestyle. That is wrong, and it’s vile. Where does it stop?

Suing someone to make them participate in an activity that they believe is wrong or a sin is vile. Shall NAMBLA next sue and gain the right to have pedophilia celebrated? Muslim underage weddings? How about Satanic rituals? Where is the line? Where does it stop?

Gays who will resort to this are not forcing their issue, they are giving God the finger and kicking Christians. There are plenty of churches and pastors willing to hop on the bandwagon but a lot of gays are not satisfied with equality - they want to subvert Christian values, obviously.

So suing someone to participate in an activity they do not support or believe in, will stop where? What activities are OK to be forced, and which are not? Is it ever OK to force someone to commit what they believe to be a sin?

Why wouldn’t the left stop at gay marriage? George Takei says destroying religious beliefs is next. So tell me, what sins are acceptable to force on a person or group against their will? Is it the sin or the destruction of values that is more important to the left?

[LS]

And the dogs. Don’t forget the dogs.

[Noumenon]

That’s pretty much my strategy. I may be older and slower but I have an stg58 FAL that will speak for me.

[Vic S]

I don’t know why anyone or corporation would continue to send money to these homo agenda groups since they’ve won their gay marriage BS. I wonder how many of the big corporations that backed homo marriage ever did anything for family value groups.

I don't think it's the corporations, I am pretty sure it's the big foundations. The Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie, Ford, Guggenheim Fellowship, etc. The large Tax-Exempt Foundations have been changing society since 1909. What the Reece Commission in 1953 found will shock you! Listen to lead investigator Norman Dodd be interviewed by G Edward Griffin on youtube. We are in an oligarchy and these foundations are their tools.

[pluvmantelo]

Religious Freedom Restoration Act

[boycott]

I don’t doubt that the foundations play a big role in this but corporations play a big role too.

As you can see, their Corporate Partners are listed on the linked site:

http://www.hrc.org/the-hrc-story/corporate-partners

Platinum Partners
Gold Partners
Silver Partners
Bronze Partners

[RipSawyer]

Thanks for answering one question, I don’t suppose you have an answer to the second one.

[pluvmantelo]

Sorry, above my pay grade.

[NetAddicted]

Gross, Daily Beast. Total cr*p.

[RipSawyer]

I don’t think I even have a pay grade any longer. Things are just too weird for me.

[Eddie01]

"If you are really coming down in a hell storm you will need somthing other than your bothers with you. We have far too many bothers now. Why don’t you bring your brothers?"

That's it...? Your entire 33 word + 3 punctuation mark verbal vomit was predicated on a missing "r".

That is f'ing rediculous. Take the hockey helmet off and watch an episode of Norther Exposure. Holling is going hunting.

Thanks for the belly laugh!

[RipSawyer]

I thought it was funny myself.