Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim Webb: Confederate soldiers fought honorably
Politico ^ | June 24, 2015 | By Nick Gass

Posted on 06/24/2015 2:35:48 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: x

Please whatever do not try to hide your glee about the Southern purge. I am sure you are pleasing yourself as you type one handed at the thought of current events concerning this Reconstruction II.


61 posted on 06/24/2015 5:42:31 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

“Tariffs were said to be the complaint of the southern states but th e laws were changed in favor of the south before Lincoln’s election.”

The tariff played a role in secession for South Carolina and Georgia but I don’t think it was the main issue by any stretch of the imagination. However your claim that the law was changed in favor of the South before Lincoln’s election has no basis in fact.

The 1857 tariff had been a low tariff. Lincoln ran on the platform of a high tariff. The high Morrill Tariff, which Lincoln supported, was signed into law by James Buchanan after Lincoln had won the election but before he took office.


62 posted on 06/24/2015 5:44:32 PM PDT by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Let’s see. I was right about the tariff.
Lincoln ran on raising the tariff.
Lincoln is not Barack.
Everything has to go through Congress but its all moot because the South blew a fuse and started a firefight?

Would that sum it all up?


63 posted on 06/24/2015 6:00:17 PM PDT by South Dakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

How do you save it by tearing it apart?


64 posted on 06/24/2015 6:31:58 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

No they didn’t. They created exactly what they despised - only immortalizing the Peculiar Institution in the process.


65 posted on 06/24/2015 6:35:08 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The southern slavers were the tyrants.


66 posted on 06/24/2015 6:35:42 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: trubolotta
By golly, I didn’t realize a simple lesson in economics might be required to explain southern concerns over tariffs. There are plenty of good sources concerning tariff issues between 1830 and 1860.

How about directing me to one from the period?

Would you care to quote a southern leader that said the war was all about slavery? How about a general, or plain old ordinary soldier? How about quoting a black Confederate soldier?

Black Confederate soldiers were mainly a myth so I can't help you there. But as for the rest of your request, here you go.

"Our people have come to this on the question of slavery. I am willing, in that address to rest it upon that question. I think it is the great central point from which we are now proceeding, and I am not willing to divert the public attention from it." - Lawrence Keitt

"What did we go to war for, if not to protect our [slave] property?" - Virgina Senator Robert Hunter, 1865

"I am not ashamed of having fought on the side of slavery—a soldier fights for his country—right or wrong—he is not responsible for the political merits of the course he fights in ... The South was my country." - John Singleton Mosby

What was the reason that induced Georgia to take the step of secession? This reason may be summed up in one single proposition. It was a conviction, a deep conviction on the part of Georgia, that a separation from the North-was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery. -- Speech of Henry Benning to the Virginia Convention

This new union with Lincoln Black Republicans and free negroes, without slavery, or, slavery under our old constitutional bond of union, without Lincoln Black Republicans, or free negroes either, to molest us.

If we take the former, then submission to negro equality is our fate. if the latter, then secession is inevitable ---
-- Address of William L. Harris of Mississippi

"The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution -- African slavery as it exists amongst us -- the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution." - Alexander Stephens

A civil war is about taking control of government. Look at Rome, Spain and many other examples. The American Civil War is misnamed, but I would expect the victors would have it their way with history and facts be damned.

Until the early 1900's the conflict was officially titled the War of Rebellion or the War of Southern Rebellion. I have no problem returning to those more accurate names.

67 posted on 06/25/2015 3:53:47 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
why would the South not sell cotton to the Northern states?

Because the Northern states were shooting at them.

68 posted on 06/27/2015 11:10:38 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson