Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Other Southern States' Flags Also Evoke the Confederacy
ABC News ^ | 06/22/2015 | Meghan Keneally

Posted on 06/22/2015 3:19:00 PM PDT by ScottWalkerForPresident2016

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: rockrr
Could you please provide a link to evidence that “both sides agreed slavery was not the issue as slavery was held by both sides at the beginning”? Thanks.

Now don't you start into this discussion with your deceitful argument. You know very well where is the evidence that the issue of slavery was not the sticking point in the war. What was the sticking point was Independence.

Lincoln made it clear that slavery would be tolerated, but what would NOT be tolerated was a government independent of Washington D.C.

Stop trying to deceive people.

81 posted on 06/23/2015 6:16:47 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Sorry, the South was oppressing their slaves. The North was who freed them.

What about the Northern slave states? Was the North oppressing their slaves too?

Inquiring minds want to know if it was just southern slaves being oppressed.

82 posted on 06/23/2015 6:20:28 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Did you ever consider that statements such as you made are part of the problem?

The problem isn't symbolism. The problem is real, concrete differences. The problem is an abject refusal from some to "melt" in the "melting pot."

A stubborn insistence on maintaining a culture at odds with the main culture, and at odds with any hope of success.

The problem is not symbols, it's attitudes which are not compatible with improving ones situation.

83 posted on 06/23/2015 6:23:37 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
There were many black slave owners in the South or did you miss that in your history books? When Ruffin caned Stevens on the floor of Congress, it was the black slave owners of Charleston that presented Ruffin with a new cane to carry with him back to Congress.

I did not know that, and that's funny.

84 posted on 06/23/2015 6:25:59 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

A Captain wrote in his letter back home that “if this war is to be fought over slaves, we couldn’t get two regiments to fight on the field”. This Captain was in the Illinois Infantry at Shiloh and referenced in a book about Shiloh.


85 posted on 06/23/2015 6:37:00 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
The book I mentioned was Seeing the Elephant that was written to give a psychological profile of the soldiers that fought at Shiloh using statistical methods using the letters and writings of the soldiers that were there. This statement by the Captain was in the chapter, "Why they Fought".
86 posted on 06/23/2015 6:39:52 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I prefer to leave the deceit to you.


87 posted on 06/23/2015 7:28:34 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Please stop with the deceitful posts.


88 posted on 06/23/2015 7:29:21 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
You are trying to convince someone (anyone?) that the Confederate Battle Flag represents oppression. Simply not true. You have not studied the subject nor do you seem likely to entertain another viewpoint. What about the African Nationalist flag? Slavery was invented in Africa and continues there today. Does that flag represent oppression? How about Old Glory? Do you think that flag represents oppression?

You can't feed a horse that's not hungry.

89 posted on 06/23/2015 7:32:17 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465029671?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o08_s00

The Cause of All Nations: An International History of the American Civil War Hardcover – December 30, 2014 by Don H. Doyle

90 posted on 06/23/2015 7:35:21 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Sounds interesting - I’ll look into it. But I doubt that I will find anything in there at supports the assertion that there was any agreement between leaders of the north and south eliminating slavery as a central bone of contention.

Slavery was the “elephant in the room”.


91 posted on 06/23/2015 7:58:43 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
I prefer to leave the deceit to you.

So much worse for you that I am not doing it, while you are.

This response from you is itself deceitful. You completely ignore addressing the evidence I just provided you, and instead resort to your little pot shots.

92 posted on 06/23/2015 8:04:21 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Please stop with the deceitful posts.

Pointing out that five Union states were slave states is deceitful? I would think refraining from mentioning that fact is what is deceitful.

You absolutely abhor the existence of this piece of information because it completely undermines your argument.

If the war was fought to abolish slavery, then how did these five Union slave states not get their own slavery abolished first?

Yeah, that's a tough argument to sell when people know the truth.

93 posted on 06/23/2015 8:06:46 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
A Captain wrote in his letter back home that “if this war is to be fought over slaves, we couldn’t get two regiments to fight on the field”. This Captain was in the Illinois Infantry at Shiloh and referenced in a book about Shiloh.

I have read a quote from General Grant saying much the same thing, but others have disputed the authenticity of this quote. I don't know if it is true or not, but I have little doubt the sentiment expressed therein was true.

94 posted on 06/23/2015 8:08:45 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Who is claiming that the “war was fought to abolish slavery”?


95 posted on 06/23/2015 8:34:08 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Who is claiming that the “war was fought to abolish slavery”?

Okay, fine. I keep forgetting that you are about the only person arguing for the Union Actions in the Civil war, who ISN'T arguing the war was fought to abolish slavery.

Keep in mind, that from my perspective there is only one of you, and millions of the others.

Usually when you see hoof prints you think "Horse", not "Zebra."

96 posted on 06/23/2015 9:11:42 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I don’t know of anyone at FreeRepublic (except for the lost causers) who argue that the north went to war to free the slaves. You simply see what you want to see - and fight the strawman you want to fight.


97 posted on 06/23/2015 9:32:26 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
I don’t know of anyone at FreeRepublic (except for the lost causers) who argue that the north went to war to free the slaves. You simply see what you want to see - and fight the strawman you want to fight.

If the Union apologetics argument is not based on the abolition of slavery, then what is the word "Slave" doing in the discussion?

The Southern side argues "Invasion." "Defense of Homeland." "Independence". The Union Apologist side keeps using the "Slave" word.

98 posted on 06/23/2015 10:48:01 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ScottWalkerForPresident2016
If removing this flag reduces the daily mass murders of blacks by crazed whites, it'll all be worth it. According to some, hundreds if not thousands of blacks are gunned down daily by whites every day in this racist nation!

If nothing else, this will stop thugs from getting shot while they resist arrest after robbing something... if this doesn't do it, then we'll probably have to ban guns, hot rods, beer, country music and BBQ grills next.

99 posted on 06/23/2015 11:02:46 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Who's apologizing? I'm proud that the union kicked your asses ;')

The Southern side argues "Invasion." "Defense of Homeland." "Independence".

Jeebus but you're obdurate. Only the lost causers cited those and only after the fact. The confederates said one thing (besides their temper tantrum "nobody gonna tell me what to do!") and that was SLAVERY.

100 posted on 06/23/2015 12:06:32 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson