Posted on 06/09/2015 11:11:21 AM PDT by Prolixus
I say you and the others who have tried to cook up many excuses for the outlaw gangsters are not at all interested in protecting the Constitution and rather are much more interested in assisting these criminals continue to violate that very Constitution for their victims by being blatant criminals who think they can intimidate Constitutional abiding citizens and rove about above the law with impunity.
I say you think we are damn fools. The fools instead are the bike gang apologists.
You nor anyone else will be given any free pass to misrepresent the reality of what took place at Waco or who the guilty parties are unchallenged here or elsewhere.
“On Dec. 12, 10 Bandidos burst into Gator’s bar in Fort Worth and “without saying a word, started punching and attacking people,” according to a police affidavit.
They then opened fire, killing one motorcycle club member, Geoff Brady of Arlington, and injuring three others, police said.”
I quite agree. Many of the “innocent bikers” dress and act as much like the outlaws as they can get away with because they get a charge from citizens being scared of them.
Much like the “innocent youths” in the hood who dress and act as much like gang members as they can for the same reason.
That said, excessive bail violates our constitution. And $1M for much of anything less than murder or treason is excessive. With possible exception for mobster types.
“The fools instead are the bike gang apologists.”
Right now it is hard to tell these threads from those at DU.
Back up you claim and personal attack with verifiable fact.
“And $1M for much of anything less than murder”
The affidavits are for murder ... under the Texas Rico statutes.
I asked the same and this is what he posted to me.
I have no association with any motorcycle club or gang. The rhetoric you and some other posters on FR use regarding motorcycle clubs or gangs sounds very much like the rhetoric I’ve heard regarding the NRA and the Tea Party (I wonder, would Hillary like to arrest anyone for posting on FR?). We’ve got to adhere to the rule of law whether we like it or not.
If you want to buy in to his lies and bullsh!t then feel free.
I have put up with personal attacks from his sorry ass on several occasions over the last couple of weeks, so if you are here to defend him than you can also go f--- yourself.
Again, you are a bald-faced liar. i have never posted any such thing and your lying, sorry, ass KNOWS it.
I'll remember you said that when all charges are dropped against all but two or three of the men arrested.
“The rhetoric you and some other posters on FR use regarding motorcycle clubs or gangs sounds very much like the rhetoric I’ve heard regarding the NRA and the Tea Party (I wonder, would Hillary like to arrest anyone for posting on FR?). “
LOL! The rhetoric you and some other posters here is EXACTLY the same as I see on DU!
” i have never posted any such thing and your lying, sorry, ass KNOWS it.”
I didn’t ring your bell.
I have no idea what “I didn’t ring your bell” means, but I am allowed to defend myself from your lying, deceitful attacks.
You accused me of posting something which I did not post. I called you on it.
It’s just further proof that you are an inveterate liar.
As far as making posts that look like DU, you need to look in the mirror.
Examples?
I’m sure anyone who sounds like me on DU is swimming-against-the-tide there.
“I have no idea what “I didn’t ring your bell” means, but I am allowed to defend myself from your lying, deceitful attacks. You accused me of posting something which I did not post. I called you on it.”
As I said before, I didn’t pull your chain.
“Examples? I’m sure anyone who sounds like me on DU is swimming-against-the-tide there.”
I don’t post from DU but go there yourself. Your posts about Waco would seem tame over there.
Back your claim with examples.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.