Posted on 05/06/2015 6:52:42 AM PDT by rktman
Well, yeah. She's probably not used to seeing them when they're not behind a lawn mower or pushing a laundry cart.
She was TERRIBLE, her head was bobbing up and down the whole time. She came off as so FAKE. And stupid, she really is dumb. She was all in on amnesty, at one point she said that we need to legalize everyone so they can make more money so Americans who’s jobs they have taken can make more money too. That was the gist of her point.
That’s just the whole point. I mentioned in another thread earlier today that even though she is a lousy speaker and godawful to watch in public, all that is needed is to trot her out on “Oprah” or “The View” and the drive bys will deal with her in tones sweeter than honey and prop her up big time.
If you were to compare how ones like Hedda Hopper and Louella Parsons covered Hollywood (under the control of ones like Louis B Mayer and Harry Cohn) in the 1930s through 1950s era to how Oprah, Rosie, Norah, and others (under the control of the Democrat machine)cover politics today, you’d be hard pressed to find any difference.
Uh, does that translate to “I ain’t know ways tahred.” LOL!
Hispanics in Nevada? Hotel housekeepers?
That woman has had major botox! No wonder she bobs up and down - she can’t move a muscle in her face!!
Hillary: “Ah ain’t no ways tarred.....” No! Wait a minute...uh....uh....oops.
A face made for radio, a voice made for silent films, and a personal philosophy made for a female sonder commando at a Polish ‘arbeit macht frie’ kampen.
All the Republican candidates need to do is loudly and proudly stand for AMERICANS first. They will win hands down and will force the dems to admit that they are more concerned about people from OTHER countries rather than americans.
Dear American who intends to vote for Hillary Clinton,
I don't know how to put this tactfully, so I'm just going to say it.
You're a moron.
You know how Bill Clinton came out yesterday to defend the Clinton Foundation and his $500k speeches by saying he's "gotta pay the bills?" Do you find it odd in the slightest that Hillary hasn't answered a single question about that? Doesn't it concern you at all that it's her husband doing the talking, and while she's running around Chipotles trying to pretend she's interested in the "everyday American" she's seemingly oblivious to the fact that he thinks it's completely normal to talk about NEEDING $500k speech income to cover their bills?
(Side note: I don't begrudge them making zillions of dollars from people stupid enough to pay it to them, by the way. But I DO begrudge them trying to pretend as if they have the FIRST CLUE about the plight of the everyday American.)
Do you find it odd in the slightest that she wiped her server clean after doing all kinds of government business via the personal email account connected to that server? Do you genuinely see nothing wrong the fact that when it comes to transparency, the Clintons are absolutely opaque? Past behavior is a predictor of future behavior. If you haven't figured that out by now, then you're worse than a moron. The way that Hillary is behaving in her campaign (guarded, only speaking to "regular people" who've been carefully vetted, and avoiding the press at all costs) is EXACTLY how she'll behave as president. Is that really ok with you? And if it is, WTF is wrong with you that you're willing to tolerate that from your own president?
Don't you find there to be a problem with a woman who was quick to blame a "vast, right-wing conspiracy" on her sleazy husband's infidelities, and then neglected to apologize for that remark after it was clear that her husband lied to her AND the entire country?
Do you really want the first woman president to be so sheltered and elitist that she hasn't even driven a CAR in the last couple of decades? Do you really want the first woman president to be someone who allowed herself to be completely humiliated by her husband?
Are you even remotely aware of the utter failure Hillary Clinton was as secretary of state? She was woefully unprepared in Libya, which has devolved into utter chaos, she was caught off guard by the Arab Spring, she completely misjudged Syria's president, and the list goes on and on. By nearly every measure, the world looks less favorably at the US than they did even during Bush's tumultuous time in office. Even SHE isn't good at describing her accomplishments. Doesn't that concern you?
So what exactly do you see in her? It can't be her charisma or her likeability, because let's face it, she's at best unpleasant. Is it her economic approach - to do the same crap that Obama has done - which has more people on public assistance than ever, more debt than ever, and more bureaucracy then ever?
WHAT IN THE HOLY HELL are you thinking?
It's not enough that she's a woman. That's like the lamest reason to vote for someone EVER. What we need is competence, not to make some sort of feminist statement.
Use your brain, look at her candidacy honesty and critically, and then if you still want to vote for her, please find the nearest available person, and ask them to punch you in the face repeatedly.
Because you deserve it.
Love,
Mock
Hillary is uncomfortable with Hispanics because of, well, White Privilege. She regards Hispanics as poor, uneducated and ignorant masses. I know, I’m one of them. Most democrats believe we’re too stupid to get a job or achieve anything without their help from the “White Rulers”. I’m just so tired of the condescending attitude of the democrats towards us Hispanics. That’s my two cents worth. And Cinco De Mayo? They don’t even celebrate it in Mexico except in some remote villages in the Puebla district. Good Grief.
I couldn’t watch much either but her hair looks nice. Pardon me while I barf!
Hey Hillary - when we talk about 'legal status' it's code for ' why are illegals allowed to flood into our country - send illegals home."
![]() |
You can help: |
Right-click this image and save it. Send a copy to your Senators and Reps whenever you communicate with them. When you get fundraising solicitations, include a copy in your reply. Send copies to your friends and family and ask them to do likewise. |
That's for the women. I believe the men stand on the street shoving porn cards into the faces of tourists.
Didn’t it used to be called trespassing? Just wondering.
You're right on this... we will get MORE of what we reward - it's how life works.
When illegals are rewarded with citizenship, MORE illegals will come.
Few people recognize how important this mass immigration from the third world is to the American left.
JFK and the democrat party were pushing chain immigration, generations ago.
Here is the democratic platform that JFK ran on in 1960:
Immigration:
We shall adjust our immigration, nationality and refugee policies to eliminate discrimination and to enable members of scattered families abroad to be united with relatives already in our midst.
The national-origins quota system of limiting immigration contradicts the rounding principles of this nation. It is inconsistent with our belief in the rights of man. This system was instituted after World War I as a policy of deliberate discrimination by a Republican Administration and Congress.
The revision of immigration and nationality laws we seek will implement our belief that enlightened immigration, naturalization and refugee policies and humane administration of them are important aspects of our foreign policy.
These laws will bring greater skills to our land, reunite families, permit the United States to meet its fair share of world programs of rescue and rehabilitation, and take advantage of immigration as an important factor in the growth of the American economy.
In this World Refugee Year it is our hope to achieve admission of our fair share of refugees. We will institute policies to alleviate suffering among the homeless wherever we are able to extend our aid.
We must remove the distinctions between native-born and naturalized citizens to assure full protection of our laws to all. There is no place in the United States for “second-class citizenship.”
The protections provided by due process, right of appeal, and statutes of limitation, can be extended to non-citizens without hampering the security of our nation.
We commend the Democratic Congress for the initial steps that have recently been taken toward liberalizing changes in immigration law. However, this should not be a piecemeal project and we are confident that a Democratic President in cooperation with Democratic Congresses will again implant a humanitarian and liberal spirit in our nation’s immigration and citizenship policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.