Posted on 05/05/2015 8:50:33 PM PDT by servo1969
Theres a magazine to the left, just next to the evidence marker 35 (which is knocked over). It's got what looks to me to be the classic curve of an AK mag.
As someone said earlier, it doesn't matter if they get sharia law by implementation or intimidation -- it's all the same to them.
I take that back. That's not as curved as an AK mag. More like an AR-15.
Thanks for posting this!
I just now recognized it looking at the pic again. The object directly between markers 34 and 35, (looks kinda like a boom box) right next to the weapon is a dual drum magazine.
Good eye. AK’s typically do not have dual drum mags, which are made primarily for AR-15s.
However, after checking, the rifle does appear to be the AK variant and they do make dual drums for AKs.
Maybe he took the front sight off. It is interesting that it appears to be missing.
But the curve of the standard mags is different from an AK and an AR. Right next to marker 35 is a standard mag that looks to be for an AR.
Islam is not a religion.
Islam is a sociopolitical form of governance masquerading as a religion.
It spells out what your governance should be, it spells out who you can speak to, be friends with, it also says to kill those who don’t believe as you do.
And you excuse that.
I'm leaning toward AK-74.
Don’t forget Regal. *I* got that one. :)
Saw that one coming. A slow burner, but no less satisfying.
Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9: 5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29).
Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85).
It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5: 11), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193).
It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17).
It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34).
“As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9).
Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9).
The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4).
As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34).
It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10).
It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228).
It not only denies the women’s equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282).
This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four views and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3).
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/
Search to your imbecilic hearts content, you’ll find most of the Sura sections mentioned are correct.
USC changed their format around a couple years back, but before they did, the following thread had everything correct:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/528671/posts?page=7#7
BUSTED TROLL IS BUSTED.
Regal the limp wristed, flouncing around and slapping with purses since Dec 22 2014, er.. he claimed 1999..
Surprised he wasn’t zotted on the previous thread, I still think he’s a lib leftist professor. lol
Thanks for the ping, TOL and hope you’re doing well!
Good question, because he was laboring under a really big fundamental misconception:
"but what I do know, is that if the human spirit is inherently good"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.