Posted on 05/05/2015 8:26:25 AM PDT by HammerT
What you posted is a good argument. Some are trying to say that we shouldn’t have a Mohammed cartoon contest because it offends Muslims and could incite violence. What about gay pride parades? Muslims are offended by gays too, and they kill them.
Yes, most definitely. I tell them that I prefer a conversation based on facts and logic.
Let's put that argument to better use, what if banning muslims not only makes me feel safer, but actually does make me safer?
Therefore, I'm guessing the odds favor a reversal of Easterbrook's opinion either by an en banc decision of the full 7th Circuit or by the SCOTUS.
You will need to plan to enter Reeducation 101 when the “safety for all camps” open!
Bullies fear guns and corporal punishment or a good punch in the mouth. Those loudmouths at OWS or any of the others that get in your face have decided that any physical retribution no matter how slight is punishable by the state.
Will a ban on young black males in hoodies and baggy pants be allowed?
[sarc]
Well I know I FEEL safer when
- gays and pedofiles are not allowed to live in my neighborhood.
- unions are not allowed to organize
- Muslims are not allowed to build a mosque
- ....
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
/sarc
This is one in a large tangle of issues.
Bullies are fine with guns or whoopin’s or punches as long as they are the ones dealing them out...
NOT being able to feel, is interestingly tied to sociopathy.
The problem isn’t feelings.
The problem is feelings that aren’t tied to anything greater.
Illegal decision.
Appeal.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Sounds pretty dang infringy to me!
Cowardly leftists!
I am beginning to think that maybe we should just change the national anthem from Star-Spangled Banner to “Feelings”! That is how ridiculous this country has become courtesy of Libtards.
I would feel safer if liberals never again spoke in public. Does that mean we can legally infringe on the free speech rights of America’s enemies? By this judge’s logic, the First Amendment rights of democrats are at risk.
“We have judges today who dont even care about the law and most of those are appointed by Democrats.”
This is the reason for the big push to federalize the police.
Federal police enforce federal laws and trials are conducted by federal judges appointed by dems.
Laws can then made by dem appointed judges without the input of the citizens and their representatives.
How many people here vote to impeach those two appellate court justices so they will FEEL safer in the community?
Well, if that’s the way you FEEL, then it must be the law of the land then...
You will note as Rush did yesterday, that our comrades on the nation’s socialist left only seem to be concerned about ‘selected’ offenses to the Islamic Death cult.
This is because their agenda of suppressing dissent goes along with the Islamic Death cult’s agenda.
As far as other parts of what ‘offends’ the Muslims.....
Would that make you feel safer?
Then by the same ‘logic’.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.