Posted on 05/02/2015 11:02:32 AM PDT by IChing
Some others have no problem comprehending what is presented. That means the failure is yours, and that of other dense/lazy “readers.”
IChing, I have read the whole story there, and I just wanted to thank you for presenting it.
Based upon that analysis, it does appear that something is amiss here.
Bkmrk.
That is not the kind of poster that is ever going to admit error. That’s one reason he won’t be here long.
Changes the headline error one. Apparently he didn’t bother to read posting guidelines...or failed to understand them. Error two was the excerpting that was done like a third grader. Three is his myopic approach to blog pimping.
This is OJ Simpson in reverse. If the witness does fit you must acquit.
My pleasure, chris37. “Amiss” is quite an understatement.
I didn’t know Jayne Miller was a lesbian. Wow.
"He was thrashing around" -- possible, I guess.
"Like he was trying to hurt himself" -- how do you know?
Somebody ought to clue in Mia Maria Pope about this.
That fact that a few people are able to piece your puzzle together doesn’t mean that you haven’t given us a puzzle. I read your excerpt and saw nothing there that supported your headline. It wasn’t until I read Bogey78O’s nutshell summary that I understood the meaning of all this.
Communication is an art, and not everyone has the knack for it.
The 38yo male identified in the article; his arrest time does not jive with the arrest time of Mr. Gray. There are already plenty of errors going on.
What’s sad is that years ago, Freepers used to do the kind of investigative thoroughness that the Treepers are doing now. Just read the comments below this Treeper thread, any Treeper thread — THEY are the sleuths busting the latest Dan Rathers again and again nowadays, while idiots on FR like humblegunner attack posters here for linking to vital breaking information via blogs, etc.
No, it did not. So the standard procedure is to shorten it when posted.
I find no fault with your title. It is MUCH better than the original.
But I had no way of knowing it had been previously posted.
It is no big deal to me, I did it myself once and was called on the carpet for not following the procedure. Someone at that time told me they thought my title was better than the original.
I’m not being disrespectful, only scratching my head about updated titles on Conservative Tree House.
bttt!
Ha! Sure, sure — according to you, this:
*On April 29th the Washington Post ran an explosive article highlighting information from a passenger who was inside the transport vehicle at the same time Freddie Gray was driven toward central booking. According to the Washington Post source: Freddie Gray was intentionally “trying to injure himself“.
On April 30th local Baltimore media outlet WBAL-TV introduced Donta Allen, a person they claimed was the passenger in the transport vehicle.
However, THEY ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON.*
...doesn’t support this:
*EXPLOSIVE – Man Presented on TV as Freddie Gray’s Paddy Wagon Companion IS AN IMPOSTOR*
Run along now, skippy
>>Scoff all you want, ignoramus.
Probably shouldn’t frig with that guy NOOB.
Jibe, not jive. And what you think is a discrepancy actually is not; it is explained in the comments below the Treehouse post.
Among the earliest comments, that is, so you don’t have to wade through all of them.
10-4
Conservative Treehouse is original stuff. Have you examined it?
Just post the comment here, why would I need to go to another site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.