As I said I n the last article on this issue- it’s all well and good but if the SC doesn’t find in favor of gay marriage, then the gay agenda will get to scream bloody hell about the SC being bullied by extremist right wing bigots who bullied the court to vote against their conscience
Which would be fine IF that’s all that would happen- I’d say ‘let them scream and whine- ‘ but my fear is that this would give the gaystapo further leverage to claim discrimination when the case if brought back before the courts-
For this civil disobedience to work, the effort has to be massive- them oral majority has to get involved, because if they don’t, courts will simply target the few who are doing the civil disobedience, and make them out to be criminals- but if the effort is massive, nationwide, then it stands a much better chance- BUT it the civil disobedience MUST be coupled with the TRUTH and that is that gay marriage is a DEVIANT lifestyle choice that is not protected by the constitution, nor are any other DEVIANT lifestyle choices, and that any judges that ruled otherwise were forsaking their obligation to judge in an objective manner and therefore the new law is illegitimate, hence the need for civil disobedience- But again, the effort MUST be massive and nationwide in order to be effective
States banded together once before and did this civil disobedience things, and the effort was massive enough that the federal government had to back down- but had only a couple of states done so- the government would have bullied them into submission- it was the ‘strength in numbers’ effort that prevailed
However, I agree with this stance. I do not serve the government. The government serves me. If it no longer serves me, then it is no longer my government, and I am no longer bound by its laws.
Last October, when SCOTUS took this up, I made the following assertion:
“The next battle will be a requirement for clergy to conduct these perverted unions. Since clergy are authorized to sign official state records (marriage licenses), that leaves a great big gaping hole that some libtard simply needs to jump through to assert that a church marriage is not merely a religious ceremony, but is an extension of a State Government function...and, as such, public accommodation laws must apply. Just a matter of time... “
Apparently, “some libtard” is getting ready to jump through that hoop.