Posted on 04/26/2015 4:36:19 PM PDT by markomalley
Just to do due diligence, is there any way to “impeach” such characters?
In the meantime, his background should be examined with a fine tooth comb. Those who do evil seldom only do it once.
Self righteous scumbag Democrat knows nobody has the guts to go after him knowing anybody that does is targeted, silenced, and it’s going to cost them one ‘H’ of a lot of money they have to raise from people who will then be targeted, therefore nobody will come to their aid.
He’s a punk.
‘Did he read any of those books in the background?’
Sure he did, and studied them extensively to see how he could further his power at the least risk.
Smart manipulators and exploiters study the law.
“When in the course of human events it becomes necessary...” is still out there Mr Chisolm. So you want to tred on us I suggest you be ready for “blowback”
Freegards
LEX
The bulk of the anti action could be conducted from out of state. Why can’t he be John Doe complainted too with the actual litigant shielded?
Of course, it isn’t at “NO” risk.
As to defamatory remarks, I strongly suspect the Iowa criminal code, like Wisconsins, has provisions for intentionally making false statements intended to harm the reputation of others, Chisholm said in a statement Saturday responding to Walkers comments.
Under the Sedition Act, even the rights of American citizens were curtailed by prohibiting assembly with intent to oppose any measure
of the government and made it illegal for any person to print, utter, or publish
any false, scandalous, and malicious writing against the government.
He’s hoping he can now get it “liberal judged” into law when legislation has not gone his way. Given how Barack Obama has been his rear guard in the Federal arena, the temptation is understandable.
That’s a disgusting parasite, if I’ve ever seen one.
First step to going down.
He needs to be removed and disbarred pronto.
I hope that if and when he is eventually backed into a corner, conservatives do not just “nice it over.”
This type of thing must be set forth as an example of the fundamentally intolerable. It is a grab at tyranny, at rule by the Machiavellian will of man with no underlying ethics (hypocrisy is writ large over the whole thing).
I would settle for throwing himself in front of a fast-moving train.
What did any fast moving train do to deserve that?
Don't forget to add the Hitler mustache before it does.
Nothing, but when the times comes, we'll all have to make sacrifices.
Mustaches are often added as whimsical to things like the Mona Lisa. This one would be serious satire.
Some out of state news agency ought to investigate this one.
By stooping to their level, we rob God of a display of the righteous winning by heaven’s righteousness.
Another Ronnie Earl. This house needs cleaning. Mark Levin is right, we need a constitutional convention of the states. Repeal the 17th, back to our roots.
Wait..What? Iowa and Wisconsin have criminalized defamation? In my 26 years as a lawyer, I never heard of criminal defamation. Think of that. The government can punish you criminally for speech? Defamation has always been about a private citizen’s right, in limited circumstances, to seek CIVIL redress against another citizen for harm to his reputation. Typical cases require, among other things, showing monetary damage stemming from the defamatory communications, except in cases of libel per se, where the communication accuses the individual of having a hideous disease, sexual deviancy (is there such a thing any more?) or the commission of a crime.
Moreover, defamation suits are always considered an exception to First Amendment free speech rights, which are jealously guarded by the law. There is also a litigation privilege that applies to statements made in court or in a court proceeding (such as a deposition, etc.). Potentially, comments about the prosecutor’s behavior in these John Doe investigations is protected. Comments about public figures or matters of public interest (such as this prosecutor) are accorded a higher level of protection from suit than private matters and individuals. Finally, statements of opinion are absolutely protected.
So, where the hell is this jerk going with these mealy-mouthed threats?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.