Parents have a responsibility to insure that their children are under continual surveillance by appropriate authorities. It would be best if children were continually under state surveillance, but the vestiges of the “traditional”, bourgeois family are still sufficiently strong to prevent this. The state has interest in such matters for two reasons. First, by making parenthood more difficult, the state accelerates the decay of the bourgeois family. Second, it conditions children to their adult future of continuous surveillance by the state.
It’s either that or Americans tend to be insanely fearful of remote probabilities. Maybe both.
Our lives have changed for the worse.
First, just don't do things that attract attention, especially the police, (such as leave your small children in a car). Second, NEVER talk to the police without your attorney present.
[ The progressives way towards ensuring the “village” raises all our children: criminalize parental decisions. It’s for the children. ]
You would think that for a group that believes in evolution and natural selection they would simply walk by and let “Nature Take it’s Course” instead of trying to “Intelligently Designing” everyone else’s life even if they don’t want it managed by these control freaks.
Morons that push Darwin, want to constantly go against Darwin for soem reason...