Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul Puts on a Clinic
Townhall.com ^ | April 10, 2015 | David Limbaugh

Posted on 04/10/2015 7:58:54 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last
To: xzins; trisham; P-Marlowe; stephenjohnbanker
What amazes me the most is that we're even wasting our time talking about this.

Rand Paul and his father are the GOP's Dennis Kucinich, their "candidacy" is strictly for entertainment purposes because they will NEVER garner any real support.

141 posted on 04/11/2015 3:15:37 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: xzins

142 posted on 04/11/2015 3:18:15 PM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; trisham; P-Marlowe; stephenjohnbanker

I know. Rand Paul will go to Cleveland(?) with the same supporters his father had.


143 posted on 04/11/2015 3:18:22 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; xzins; trisham; P-Marlowe; stephenjohnbanker
Do you think that Rand Paul is pro-life?

No.

I think that he is a man on a mission to change the GOP from not only being pro-life, but to end it having a social conservative platform.

If that's his mission he's a bit late. The GOP IS NOT pro-life or socially conservative and never really has been.

Paul is a serious threat.

No, he's a nuisance just like his father. The threat is the GOP as a whole.

“If you’re simply taking me to task over Rand Paul being pro-life or pro-choice, then it’s because I’m looking at his consistent statements that he is pro-life, and you are looking at other things that signal to you that he is actually pro-choice. In other words, YOUR analysis has concluded that he is pro-choice. You can find no place where he has claimed to be pro-choice, so you have gone to other things to discount his words to arrive at your conclusion.”

I don't know who wrote this, but it isn't me.

Now, I'm going to eat dinner and will probably be gone until Monday.

144 posted on 04/11/2015 3:19:08 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

LOL!


145 posted on 04/11/2015 3:19:11 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; xzins; stephenjohnbanker; P-Marlowe

Thank goodness for that! I wouldn’t trust either one of them to defend our country.


146 posted on 04/11/2015 3:20:40 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: xzins; trisham; P-Marlowe; stephenjohnbanker
And half of them will wind up hanging out with the NORML protesters outside.
147 posted on 04/11/2015 3:21:07 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It’s from post #129, and I wrote it. But, it is extremely selective editing.


148 posted on 04/11/2015 3:23:02 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; xzins; stephenjohnbanker; P-Marlowe

Or the occupy crowd.


149 posted on 04/11/2015 3:24:10 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

So why is it a problem to know that Rand Paul is pro-choice as he campaigns for president?

Why for seven months, must I keep having to explain that to someone who keeps denying it?


150 posted on 04/11/2015 3:27:42 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: xzins

:)


151 posted on 04/11/2015 3:33:42 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No it wasn’t, it captured our disagreement for 7 months, me saying that Rand Paul is pro-choice and has that as his agenda for the GOP, and you not agreeing.

You defend Rand Paul and argue for more understanding for his position.

“That is why Rand Paul’s comments about being in the medical weeds regarding ‘life of the mother’ is of concern. Some have already concluded that means he is pro-choice. You are one of them. Marlowe is one of them.

I’m still open on trying to figure out what he meant BECAUSE he is an MD. MDs would see a lot of unique medical concerns when we say ‘life of mother’ that we wouldn’t see. What are those issues?”


152 posted on 04/11/2015 3:41:50 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

153 posted on 04/11/2015 3:53:26 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: xzins
B T T T ! ! ! ©

154 posted on 04/11/2015 3:56:00 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You're only posting that because you're secretly pro-choice.

I know it's true........I liked your pic of head banging......you are on notice that I am stealing it......

:-)

155 posted on 04/11/2015 3:58:07 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: xzins

:)


156 posted on 04/11/2015 3:59:18 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Those are your own quotes stating that you do not see Rand Paul as pro-choice.

Isn’t that defending Rand Paul?

To quote you: “”Some have already concluded that means he is pro-choice. You are one of them. Marlowe is one of them.

I’m still open on trying to figure out what he meant BECAUSE he is an MD.””


157 posted on 04/11/2015 3:59:51 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

And — you might not believe this — but I am ‘secretly’ in charge of the secret vault of ancient secrets secret to all! Do you know the secret handshake?

Do you mean post #135 or 139?


158 posted on 04/11/2015 4:03:09 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; xzins
Senator Paul "believes life begins at conception,” Stafford told LifeSiteNews. “He is pro-life. That’s why he introduced the Life at Conception Act. That's why he spoke at the March (for Life).”

In the interview, Blitzer asked Sen. Paul about his pro-life views, asking, “Just to be precise, if you believe life begins at conception, which I suspect you do, you would have no exceptions for rape, incest, the life of the mother – is that right?”

Paul, who is a doctor as well as a senator, answered, “I think that…puts things in too small of a box. What I would say is there are thousands of exceptions. I’m a physician, and every individual case is going to be different. Everything is going to be particular to that individual case and what is going on that mother and the medical circumstances of that mother.”

“It sounds like you believe in some exceptions,” Blitzer said.

“Well, there is going to be, like I say, thousands of extraneous situations where the life of the mother is involved and other things that are involved,” replied Paul, “so I would say that each individual case would have to be addressed, and even if there were eventually a change in the law – let’s say people came more to my way of thinking – there would still be a lot of complicated things the law may not ultimately be able to address in the early stages of pregnancy that would have to be part of what occurs between the physician, and the woman, and the family.”


159 posted on 04/11/2015 4:04:00 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

160 posted on 04/11/2015 4:06:07 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson