Posted on 03/25/2015 11:15:43 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
The NY Times should lead by example and shut down.
Sounds like I need a new t-shirt declaring that I am a perpetuator and denier. A twofer.
Global Warming presents some serious and immediate dangers to civilization and those perils are entirely the political uses of the hoax to try for total power everywhere and total impoverishment of the bulk of the world’s people.
“Journalists care about the truth—that’s my only care in life, to find the truth,” Gillis said. “To act as if the evidence is half and half is to tell a lie. I refuse to perpetuate that lie.”
Old school journalists may have cared about the truth, but today’s journ-o-lists of the Ministry of Propaganda only cares about the agenda. Lies to further the agenda are considered truth by them.
It’s “a lie” to report OPINION as fact.
Soon, the libs in power will say that presenting balance warrants a death sentence. They're not interested in balance, they're not interested in science, they're only interested in getting their way even if they need to assault the rest of us.
One problem now, is that if Global Warming is ever conclusively demonstrated to be false (by, for example, global temperatures starting a declining trend), then all the hysterical supporters will look like complete idiots. This means that they will have an incentive to double down and suppress any contrary evidence.
Um, the IPCC and the other NGOs openly admit this.
HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
'Facade' is right... but I don't think he knows what that word means.
LOL...I was going to say...and...it isn’t?
He should look up Walter Duranty of the New York Times, who didn't want the death - by starvation - of millions of Russian farmers and their families to screw up The Narrative, back in the 20s and 30s. He helped make that little mess disappear by declining to report on it. Ya gotta break a few eggs, right?
The bulb burns brightest before it burns out
No kidding! I have always maintained, that to understand what liberals are thinking, all you have to do is LISTEN to them, as hard as that may be.
I think FACADE is EXACTLY right, but the hilarious thing is...Gillis missed it completely, I am pretty sure.
THAT is “quality” journalism schools spit out.
*Global Warming presents some serious and immediate dangers to civilization and those perils are entirely the political uses of the hoax to try for total power everywhere and total impoverishment of the bulk of the world’s people.*
Exactly!
The cure is many many thousands of times worse than any possible scenario that they have come up with so far.
“if Global Warming is ever conclusively demonstrated to be false”
That cannot happen, because a testable, falsifiable presentation of Global Warming theory has not been made. In other words, the proponents don’t say “if such and such happens, the theory is false”. That means, of course, that the predictions of the theory are not useful, except perhaps to extract wealth from and exact control upon people.
Global Cooling Deniers need to get a life.
“This is much like the abortion wars: what term you use signals what side you are on,” Gillis said, adding that it’s necessary for reporters to maintain a facade of impartiality.
Gillis told students he liked to use the word “deniers” for “people who oppose climate science,” and that these people should never be called “skeptics.”
Leftists aren't confused.
Leftists are the enemies of humanity.
They don't want to "win."
They want everyone dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.