Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Palmetto Republicans favor Walker, Bush
Townhall.com ^ | March 6, 2015 | Neil McCabe

Posted on 03/06/2015 6:43:45 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 03/06/2015 6:43:45 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But isn’t Walker Bush ineligible under the 22nd amendment?


2 posted on 03/06/2015 6:45:14 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

What makes you think so?


3 posted on 03/06/2015 6:46:25 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Walking the Walker Way - Leader of the pack?
4 posted on 03/06/2015 6:47:15 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just want to inform FReepers in other States that not all Constitutional conservatives in South Carolina (who sometimes, even usually, vote for Republicans) readily identify themselves as Republican Party devotees. There aren’t enough of us to make a clear-cut difference at the polls.


5 posted on 03/06/2015 6:49:27 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
"There aren’t enough of us to make a clear-cut difference at the polls."

Sad but true. Take Lindsey Graham out of the equation and you probably have Bush with an early polling lead. SC is really no longer conservative.

6 posted on 03/06/2015 6:54:05 AM PST by buckalfa (First time listener, long time caller.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
But isn’t Walker Bush ineligible under the 22nd amendment?


7 posted on 03/06/2015 6:58:41 AM PST by COBOL2Java ("God save America" - we are at the dawn of a new dark age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
Sad but true. Take Lindsey Graham out of the equation and you probably have Bush with an early polling lead. SC is really no longer conservative.

Mizz Lindsey's only intention in running is to make sure the conservative doesn't win...


8 posted on 03/06/2015 7:06:59 AM PST by COBOL2Java ("God save America" - we are at the dawn of a new dark age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Bush is the choice of 36 percent of Hispanic South Carolina Republicans compared to Walker's 18 percent support. Among black Republicans, Bush has 27 percent compared to Walker's 7 percent.

Of course - Bush is a RINO sugar daddy.

9 posted on 03/06/2015 7:08:08 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Mizz Lindsey's only intention in running is to make sure the conservative doesn't win...

She Hate Me.
10 posted on 03/06/2015 7:11:43 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
George Walker Bush already served...
11 posted on 03/06/2015 7:14:47 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

BUSH= ‘Kiss of death’

Two white guys, one of whom has NO business in the WH

Voters will NOT buy it.

Big mistake for Walker


12 posted on 03/06/2015 7:15:05 AM PST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
You still haven't replied to my question. So let me clear something up for you who obviously does not know the constitution, which I expect from a liberal, but not a conservative which you claim to be.

1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President, when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

First of all the the amendment does not say anything about governors being illegible for the presidency or relatives of the candidate having been presidents for two terms each

13 posted on 03/06/2015 7:25:32 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Of course he did, but the article is not about him. It is about his brother, and the 22nd Amendment does not say that a brother and son of two former presidents can not run for the presidency.

I expect the ignorance about the Constitution from socalled "progressives", but not from conservatives

14 posted on 03/06/2015 7:33:17 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Two white guys, one of whom has NO business in the WH

And why not?

BTW Just to make it clear. I have no plan to vote for Jeb Bush

15 posted on 03/06/2015 7:36:47 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You obviously didn’t get my joke.


16 posted on 03/06/2015 7:44:34 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And why not?

I’m OK with Walker... but Jeb?

NOT.

Walker will be spoiling his chances with Jeb on the ticket with him


17 posted on 03/06/2015 7:53:10 AM PST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Did you read my post? I said I have no plan to vote for Jeb Bush. Also you obviously didn't get it that the article is about the voters in SC, not the entire US

You really need to change your freeper name

18 posted on 03/06/2015 7:59:04 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

That was a joke? Wow hit me with a feather


19 posted on 03/06/2015 8:00:38 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This South Carolina resident will never vote for Jeb Bush. Nor did he cast a vote for Graham in 14.


20 posted on 03/06/2015 8:01:22 AM PST by AmericanRobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson