Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules
NY Times ^
| MARCH 2, 2015
| MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Posted on 03/02/2015 6:36:50 PM PST by icwhatudo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: icwhatudo
Can you imagine the number of her staff who have to spend full-time hours just to go around and cover up stuff from her past and present.
Her mind, in the mean time, is so totally focused on winning the presidency that nothing else shows up on her political radar.
TRANSLATION: She is unknowingly taking the batteries out of her own smoke alarms.
21
posted on
03/02/2015 6:54:58 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Don't worry if plan A fails, there are 25 more letters in the alphabet.)
Welcome Home
Homes need to be cared for
Please handle it today
Let's get this done!
Less than $4.3k to go!!
22
posted on
03/02/2015 6:55:04 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!)
To: icwhatudo
Zact same thing done by the big-shot at the EPA, who I believe conjured up a secret personal email addy that was a variation on THE NAME OF HER PET.
She had a very, very strong preference to do her sensitive EPA work on THAT account, and not the one that would have shown some tiny margin of transparency.
23
posted on
03/02/2015 6:56:10 PM PST
by
gaijin
To: icwhatudo
Any government official who uses a personal email account for their government work should go to prison.
To: icwhatudo
Possibly Breaking Rules Uh, Times, I think you mean "laws."
25
posted on
03/02/2015 7:01:33 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(My hypocrisy goes only so far)
To: ClearCase_guy
If this is the best Republicans can do, the election is already over
26
posted on
03/02/2015 7:05:47 PM PST
by
PGR88
To: icwhatudo
And I expect a Federal investigation in 5...4....3...2....
ok I really dont expect a federal investigation.
27
posted on
03/02/2015 7:05:52 PM PST
by
Crim
(Palin / West '16)
To: icwhatudo
Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.
Going one better than Lois Lerner. Never mind missing emails, she didn’t even have an email address,
28
posted on
03/02/2015 7:08:02 PM PST
by
Flick Lives
("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
To: icwhatudo
Its being leaked out now so it will be called “old news” by her spin machine during the election......
29
posted on
03/02/2015 7:10:59 PM PST
by
Nextrush
(OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
To: icwhatudo
Something so very basic, where even your corporate recruits at ToysRUS are required to use corporate email for corporate business.
This is unreal...And she is going to run for President of the United States?
30
posted on
03/02/2015 7:14:11 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: icwhatudo
31
posted on
03/02/2015 7:14:19 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: icwhatudo; GeronL; MeshugeMikey
It wouldn’t surprise me to learn she was surfing for porn as well.
32
posted on
03/02/2015 7:14:56 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: icwhatudo
I believe Al Gore said it best during a debate - " There is no controlling legal authority." concerning this illegal matter. Hahahahahaha . I can't BELIEVE he got away with saying that without being laughed off the stage.
Since then, we have all sadly learned, that for a Democrat . . . there NEVER is a " controlling legal authority" for them and their misdeeds.
President Obama certainly has none. And apparently neither will the Clinton machine - AGAIN.
We literally live in a banana two bit republic.
In a Sierra Madre accent - - - " Laws ? ? ? Democrats don't need to adhere to no stinking laws ! ! ! "
33
posted on
03/02/2015 7:16:39 PM PST
by
builder
(I don't want a piece of someone else's pie)
To: icwhatudo
34
posted on
03/02/2015 7:17:06 PM PST
by
kristinn
(Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
To: icwhatudo
MSM: “Just one of those little quirks this great statesman and future president have, which just makes us love and admire her even more”.
To: icwhatudo
Was it AOL or Gmail?
Incredible!
This alone should bar her from running for President or any position involving any kind of security or confidentiality.
36
posted on
03/02/2015 7:18:16 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Sarah Barracuda
The Clintons have had people murdered and nothing happened to them, why would this make any difference "WE came, WE saw, HE DIED!!!! Hahahahahaha!" - Sec. of State Hillary Clinton on the warcrime torture, abuse, and murder of a POW named Momar Gadaffi.
CBS News clip
#HandsUpDontShoot
37
posted on
03/02/2015 7:19:17 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: builder
Since then, we have all sadly learned, that for a Democrat . . . there NEVER is a " controlling legal authority" for them and their misdeeds. President Obama certainly has none. And apparently neither will the Clinton machine - AGAIN. We literally live in a banana two bit republic. In a Sierra Madre accent - - - " Laws ? ? ? Democrats don't need to adhere to no stinking laws ! ! ! " Remember when RFK (the president's brother) was Attorney General? Remember how people questioned how impartial he might be? Nepotism meant that the DOJ may not do an honest job if the president crosses any lines. Can't have that, no longer can the President hire his brother for this office. No matter that Democrat/Communist loyalty is to the Party (which is a stronger bond than mere family relation).
38
posted on
03/02/2015 7:22:17 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: icwhatudo
Possibly breaking rules??? Out and out criminal act and massive security violation!
39
posted on
03/02/2015 7:24:53 PM PST
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: icwhatudo
Are we up to a smidgen yet?
40
posted on
03/02/2015 7:27:24 PM PST
by
SargeK
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson