Skip to comments.
Obama threatens to veto Iran bill
The Hill ^
| 02/28/2015
| Jesse Byrnes
Posted on 03/01/2015 4:59:11 PM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: SeekAndFind
The Moslem pRes_ _ent threated to “shoot it down”
like an Israeli plane.
2
posted on
03/01/2015 5:00:42 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: SeekAndFind
Finally. Now, will they play hardball?
3
posted on
03/01/2015 5:01:32 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: SeekAndFind
Perhaps Congress should vote on an Obama no confidence bill.
4
posted on
03/01/2015 5:02:09 PM PST
by
rockinqsranch
((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
To: SeekAndFind
Nuclear Deal.
Would that not be a treaty?
Doesn’t the Senate have to approve treaties?
5
posted on
03/01/2015 5:02:29 PM PST
by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: SeekAndFind
6
posted on
03/01/2015 5:03:33 PM PST
by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
To: SeekAndFind
Queen Obama doesn’t want that pesky Congress to muck up his complete sell-out to Iran.
7
posted on
03/01/2015 5:04:09 PM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
( Better a conservative teabagger than a liberal teabagee)
To: hattend
“”:Doesnt the Senate have to approve treaties?””
That was the old days before Obama..
8
posted on
03/01/2015 5:04:19 PM PST
by
CMailBag
To: SeekAndFind
Treaties (agreements ) require advice and consent of the US Senate. Since Obama is lawless. Go ahead let him veto then take it to court where the full details of the agreement willbecome public knowledge.
Freegards
LEX
To: SeekAndFind
Dick Tater is starting to really get annoying.
10
posted on
03/01/2015 5:06:38 PM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: SeekAndFind
All this guy does is threaten.
To: hattend
12
posted on
03/01/2015 5:09:18 PM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
To: SeekAndFind
A veto threat on possible legislation that would allow Congress’ weigh-in on any nuclear armaments deal Obama makes with Iran? Hmmmm...I’m not the least bit surprised that Barack, the Defender of the (Muslim) Faith, would not want anything tying his hands as he defends Islam.
Barry’s “mask” is now translucent and is becoming more and more transparent.
To: SeekAndFind
I have no doubt he will veto any sanctions against Iran..Iran is this close to having a Nuke, if they don’t already have one..and Obama will stop at nothing to make sure that happens..Obama wants to see Israel destroyed by the time his term is up
To: SeekAndFind
"Obama threatens to veto Iran bill"
The charlatan executive of "NO" threatens to strike again.
To: tet68
>>Finally. Now, will they play hardball?<<
lol...you’re kidding, right?
To: SeekAndFind
In a statement, Corker called the veto threat "disappointing."Wow, what a strong statement! That is one step stronger than "troubling".
17
posted on
03/01/2015 5:20:16 PM PST
by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
18
posted on
03/01/2015 5:21:01 PM PST
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: SeekAndFind
What a pouter. Why veto it when he can just ignore it?
To: SeekAndFind
Wait until he signs the treaty, and just have the Senate vote it down.
20
posted on
03/01/2015 5:31:02 PM PST
by
struggle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson