Skip to comments.
Ted Cruz causes headaches for Republican senators with repeal of oil export ban
Examiner ^
| January 18, 2015
Posted on 01/18/2015 9:22:47 AM PST by SoConPubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: SoConPubbie
Remove oil regulations and the Oil companies would have an easier time showing a profit
with low crude pricing. Just a thought.
21
posted on
01/18/2015 10:33:13 AM PST
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Instead of repealing Obamacare or curtailing immigration, Cruz is proposing an amendment to the Keystone XL Pipeline authorization bill that would lift the 39-year ban on crude oil exports.
22
posted on
01/18/2015 10:41:30 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: SoConPubbie
“The question, which many Republican senators have, is this the right time and is Keystone XL the right vehicle?”
The rinos probably believe it better to wait until it’s proposed by the obama administration or at least democrat leadership.
23
posted on
01/18/2015 10:46:21 AM PST
by
duffee
(Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosIf ef.)
To: SunkenCiv; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne
Instead of repealing Obamacare or curtailing immigration, Cruz is proposing an amendment to the Keystone XL Pipeline authorization bill that would lift the 39-year ban on crude oil exports.
Deceptive Statement Alert!
Now just who has it been advocating, both by his statements and actions, for the repeal of ObamaCare, up to and including, pushing for defunding Obamacare????
Well, that would be the one and only Ted Cruz!
24
posted on
01/18/2015 10:48:50 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Heaven forbid the Government does something to lower the Trade Deficit. /s
25
posted on
01/18/2015 10:52:27 AM PST
by
Kickass Conservative
(If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
To: SoConPubbie
26
posted on
01/18/2015 10:55:18 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: SoConPubbie
Using the logic of the Polling Numbers, I guess exporting ANYTHING from the United States would raise pieces here.
That would include Meat, Electronics, Automobiles and Fruit and Vegetables to name a few.
But hey, you can’t fix Stupid. Obama proves that every day.
27
posted on
01/18/2015 10:55:44 AM PST
by
Kickass Conservative
(If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
To: Kickass Conservative
28
posted on
01/18/2015 10:57:08 AM PST
by
Kickass Conservative
(If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
To: SoConPubbie
Oil is a global commodity. The more that is pumped into it globally, the closer you get to true discovery of its market value.
29
posted on
01/18/2015 11:02:46 AM PST
by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: Beagle8U
Almost impossible thanks for fedgov regulations.
30
posted on
01/18/2015 11:03:08 AM PST
by
piytar
(If you don't know what taqiyya and the doctrine of abrogation are, you are a fool!)
To: smokingfrog
“It makes no sense not to be able to export.”
Whether or not it makes sense really has no bearing on the issue, we are talking about government.
31
posted on
01/18/2015 11:06:01 AM PST
by
duffee
(Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosIf ef.)
To: SunkenCiv
Hey, you posted it. :)
Yes, you are right. But you posted a deceptive comment without any context. Shame on you!
It is a time-honored FreeRepublic tradition to post both the good and bad about someone, but it would be nice to provide some context, if you can.
32
posted on
01/18/2015 11:07:30 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Redbob
Yes, in all those new, modern, state-of-the-art refineries we've built in the last decade... US major refineries are in nearly constant improvements and upgrades. In many, the only thing as old as the original build is the main road base and the plaque near the gate.
33
posted on
01/18/2015 11:15:16 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Beagle8U
Build more refineries!? We already refine more than we use and export the surplus.
The US has spent billions upgrading refineries to process the cheaper heavy sour oil. Why is importing the cheap stuff and exporting the expensive stuff a bad idea?
34
posted on
01/18/2015 11:16:39 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: GeronL
The US does export some Alaskan oil From 1996 to 2000, about ~5.5% of the oil produced in Alaska was exported during the West Coast oil glut. Since then nearly no Alaskan oil exports.
35
posted on
01/18/2015 11:19:04 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Carthego delenda est
The government won't allow more refineries and even if they did their regulations would make it unprofitable.
There is a brand new refinery sitting idle in California for more than 40 years because the enviros won't let it be used.
You idiots don't realize that the purpose of this government is to make the population immobile so that they can be totally controlled!
36
posted on
01/18/2015 11:37:06 AM PST
by
dalereed
To: dalereed
There is a brand new refinery sitting idle in California for more than 40 years because the enviros won't let it be used. Would you provide more info on that please?
37
posted on
01/18/2015 11:47:32 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
On the coast near Camarillo, built by Occidental Petroleum.
38
posted on
01/18/2015 11:54:24 AM PST
by
dalereed
To: thackney
If we refine more than we use, and now want to export crude, why are we importing any crude from the middle east?
That doesn’t make sense.
39
posted on
01/18/2015 1:08:23 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(NOTICE : Unattended children will be given Coffee and a Free Puppy.)
To: Beagle8U
We import about 7 million barrels a day of crude oil for our refineries, in addition to the crude we produce ourselves.
But all crude is not the same. The industry has spent many billions of dollars upgrading the domestic refineries to use the heavy sour crude. It is the cheapest per barrel while containing more BTUs per barrel. Canadian oil sands for example.
Most of our increased crude oil production comes from light sweet. It makes sense to keep importing the cheap stuff that efficiently runs in our refineries while exporting the expensive light sweet.
40
posted on
01/18/2015 3:01:31 PM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson