[11th_VA]

More and more places may be doing this soon ...

[Personal Responsibility]

“...Mall officials said the new policy is not a response to any specific event....But the change follows a weekend incident where police tried to remove a large group of people from the mall when a fight broke out, leading to several arrests.”

---

Sure, of course this was not in response to any specific event. I don’t get why people are so weasely in the words that follow their actions? Do they think people can’t see the cause and effect?

[PGR88]

The problem is most of them don’t know any responsible adults.

[Gideon7]

Minneapolis’ Mall of America, the country’s largest mall, was one of the first to implement such a policy in 1996, prompting complaints from some that the decision was at least in part racially motivated

With 'some' being basically the professional community organizers and grievance groups. The policy was widely supported by the public at the time, and still is.

[SaraJohnson]

It’s a good idea considering what ‘teens” are doing today. But one problem I see: It assumes the parents of the ones causing the trouble are any better than their bad acting offspring.

[offwhite]

If white teens are not causing problems, why are they barred? Why are they being punished for something in which they did not play a part?

Given this policy of punishing ALL teens for what black teens did, will this help or hurt black/white relations?

I think we know the answer.

[bikerman]

Teens???? Black thugs. Gentle Giants?

[RightFighter]