The CIA Smacked Around A Few Terrorists. So What?

Townhall.com ^ | December 14, 2014 | John Nantz

[Policy Wonk]

On the contrary, writers rarely choose the titles for their work, editors are employed to choose a title that will arouse interest.

[going hot]

Murry mom used to really get my pressure up, until I realized the joke was on her, and started to look at the entertainment value.

Yldstrk, more a broken record, in more ways than one.

[Policy Wonk]

You say democrat only yet the senate intelligence committee contains 7 republicans, and if said republicans are RINOs then what incentive would the committee have to lie in the report? Would it be to cover up CIA operations so that they could interrogate more prisoners, potentially advancing our national security?

I realize that this could mean the end of the intelligence committee yet I fail to see exactly what that has to do with my original comment.

Due the vague term “’Good’ war” I fail to fully comprehend your last comment, as for communists and socialists, they have nothing to do with my original comment.

[John S Mosby]

You been here since June, wonk. Posted maybe 5 or 6 times. Interrogetories. Take a position, get a kit, make a plan.

If you don’t know what “the Good War” means— look it up. Great hiding place for the post WWII libs who have been apparatchiks for the comintern during and since.
Also, read about the report and stop skimming- it wasnt signed off on by ANY repub either on the committee, RINO or otherwise. The worm has turned on ole Di-Fi and company. And leaky Leahy. So you can report that to your handlers.

And Di-Fi is the queen biotch example of that ENTIRE generation, writ large and coupled with venture socialism- whether she works for the sovs or the chinee, makes no diff. She and her husband are real pieces of work— disgusting people with kabuki masks. San Fran pervs.

Critical thinking and observation— that’s what would distinguish informed dialogue.... and frankly, activism.

[John S Mosby]

Interrogatories (sic)

[Policy Wonk]

The fact I’ve been here for a short period of time is completely irrelevant to the discussion.

The fact that I haven’t posted my political views on FR does not mean I lack them, I’m not sure what you are referring to when you say kit and plan. Plan for what?

I took you advice and looked up good war only to augment my confusion, what does WW2 have to do with the current discussion?

Good point, yet you still fail to answer my question: What incentives would the Committee have to protect a project that advances our national security?

Another characteristic of informed dialogue is civility, I ask you to extend me the same courtesy I extend to you in removing obscenity and ad hominem attacks from your dialogue.