U-Va. students challenge Rolling Stone account of attack

The Washington Post ^ | December 10, 2014 | T. Rees Shapiro

[saleman]

First off, this girl is a nut.

Second, UVA administration are nuts for believing this nut and acting on a story Rolling Stone.

Third, Femi-nazi’s have redefined rape. They see rape in every sex act whether consensual or not. According to “them” P.I.V is rape no matter what.(PIV. Look it up. Damn nuts).

Fourth, Leftist’s have been trying for years to marginalize men. Men, bad. Women, saintly. Women will always be believed before men.

There’s a 5th, 6th, 7th, etc. But I’m so sick about the degradation of our society that I can’t go on.

This is not an aberration! This is becoming the new normal. If I were 16-30 again I’d be very wary of having a relationship with any woman. Sad. That’s playing right into the Femi-nazi’s hands. If it were up to them then men would just be sperm donors.

[messierhunter]

And let’s not forget, Rolling Stone blatantly lied in their article to play up the narrative they were trying to establish.

“The Rolling Stone article also said that Randall declined to be interviewed, “citing his loyalty to his own frat.” He told The Post that he was never contacted by Rolling Stone and would have agreed to an interview.”

They are as deficient in credibility as “Jackie” herself.

[WL-law]

“The Rolling Stone article also said that Randall declined to be interviewed, “citing his loyalty to his own frat.” He told The Post that he was never contacted by Rolling Stone and would have agreed to an interview.”

I suspect Rolling Stone thought they contacted “Randall” via text or email, but was in fact was communicating with an account controlled by Jackie.

Either that or Rolling Stone was flat-out lying.