Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: Decision not to indict NYPD officer 'totally incomprehensible'
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/12/03/krauthammer-decision-not-to-indict-nypd-officer-totally-incomprehensible/ ^

Posted on 12/03/2014 8:58:20 PM PST by TigerClaws

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 461-476 next last
To: Aurorales
And ALL criminals lie...

He could breathe.

right up until the point he couldn't

381 posted on 12/04/2014 1:48:07 PM PST by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales
Absolutely no one here is saying they agree with the tax.

Doesn't matter what you agree with. You have no say.

Fact is ya better comply and obey all commands from those in government. That way you can be safe.

382 posted on 12/04/2014 1:49:52 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
In the OPINION of the grand jury.

In our system, that's who counts. At least in this case, as was said earlier, in NY they needed 12 out of 23 and couldn't get it, 8 of the 23 were black BTW. Sometime people actually do their jobs and the outcome isn't always obvious.

383 posted on 12/04/2014 1:50:05 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: caww

“Frankly I could care less if they’re banned or not....when you mess with the police by taunting and resisting arrest you’re leaving yourself wide open for what happens thereafter and responsibility for.”

Well, then why even bother trying to handcuff and detain people, when we can just let the cops shoot anyone would won’t immediately prostrate themselves?


384 posted on 12/04/2014 1:50:09 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

“In our system, that’s who counts.”

Yes, but it is still only an opinion, and the poster I was replying to was stating it as if it were an indisputable fact. That was the point of my post.


385 posted on 12/04/2014 1:51:06 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Yep..that would be fine with me...might get the criminal element under control if they know they’re going to get shot first and asked questions later.


386 posted on 12/04/2014 1:52:17 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

His family will have a strong civil suite, they will be millionares.


387 posted on 12/04/2014 1:53:33 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Agree. Once I connected the GJ verdict with the actual case, I was shocked. This was pretty clear cut abuse of power and police brutality. The timing couldn’t be worse.

Where before, the Brown family had no legitimate leg to stand on, now they do. Period.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot on NYC. At least they can’t make it a conservative conspiracy. The NYC is back to being a complete liberal cesspool again.


388 posted on 12/04/2014 1:53:50 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I agree. This is completely different with Ferguson.

First, why are the police even enforcing cigarette taxes? That stupid tax and using police to enforce is the root cause.

Second, the officers violated their own department’s procedures and had full control over the man yet continued to push and use full force on him. Never once did he swing at an officer or post any real threat to them. No punches kicks or even threats of doing so.

I agree it was unintentional manslaughter. Was gross negligence by the police here.

This could be anyone in this guy’s shoes who, say, has a drink or two walking down the sidewalk and smarts off to a cop. One officer was fired this year after choking some college kid during an arrest because someone had a phone camera out. People have been arrested merely for filming cops in public places.

I think the state and its actors should be restrained by our laws, not given unlimited powers of life and death.


389 posted on 12/04/2014 1:58:36 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Or you could get mad at the police over real things like throwing flashbangs into babies cribs instead of fake outrage over morbidly obese career criminals that drop dead while resisting.


390 posted on 12/04/2014 2:02:37 PM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
I'm an ER nurse. I have a lot of experience with impaired respiration, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, dyspnea, impaired gas exchange, airway compromise. Whatever you want to call it, I have seen countless cases of "difficulty breathing" and I have seen more than a few actual cases of "not breathing" and let me tell you, there's a big difference.

A person who is having "difficulty breathing" will tell you "I can't breathe" when in fact, they are breathing, just not well. A person who is "not breathing" is not speaking. Period. They are unconscious and generally require immediate mouth to mouth resuscitation or bag mask ventilation and/or CPR to prevent brain damage and death.

Garner resisted arrest. He shouldn't have done that if he wasn't prepared for the consequences. It isn't obvious to me that the cop with his arm around Garner's neck choked him to death however. Garner was talking until he went down and then the pack fell on him. There were a lot of police hands on him once he hit the ground and he was still talking at that point and the choke was released. After the choke was released, Garner developed difficulty breathing and said as much like 11 times.

As an ER nurse, I would have been taking his complaint very seriously at that point. I would have called a code blue in fact. The cops left him laying on the ground however, unconscious and not breathing and did not perform immediate CPR. The ambulance arrived and the coroner said he had a myocardial infarction en route to the hospital in the ambulance. That's probably BS IMO. He dies on the side walk. He may have died from a heart attack but it wasn't in the back of the ambulance, it was on the sidewalk shortly after the take down maneuver.

This is what it looks like to me.

391 posted on 12/04/2014 2:07:44 PM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

New York takes there tax laws very seriously apparently. God help you if you miss a toll in Chicago.


392 posted on 12/04/2014 2:09:33 PM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
... it was surely an accident ...

That's what he's saying. There's a category for involuntary manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide that may apply here.

A lot of civilians get sent away for things they didn't intend to make happen.

393 posted on 12/04/2014 2:11:22 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Toll

Oh ya mean the event where the government in Georgia threw and explosive through a window into some baby’s face and the suspect wasn’t even home?

The same incident where they didn’t indict the government agents responsible and then the government declined to pay for all the damages?

Looken sharp America....


394 posted on 12/04/2014 2:14:29 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
"Yes, but it is still only an opinion, and the poster I was replying to was stating it as if it were an indisputable fact. That was the point of my post.

I suppose but in our system, it's the only opinion that matters and legally the fact. I guess civilly it could be different and that would be a different opinion. When someone is convicted of a crime in a trial that is also an opinion in the sense you are referring to, but again in our system it's the only one that counts.

395 posted on 12/04/2014 2:17:56 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

It was a choke hold, but not a “choke, choke” hold.

Can’t believe no one beat me to it. :)


396 posted on 12/04/2014 2:36:15 PM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

He DID NOT die of asphyxiation.

Catch up.


397 posted on 12/04/2014 2:43:20 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: caww

Well, at least you are honest.


398 posted on 12/04/2014 2:51:11 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: x

“”There’s a category for involuntary manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide that may apply here.””

I don’t want to second guess the grand jurors because I haven’t read all of the evidence that they had. I just think Charles is being irresponsible right now.


399 posted on 12/04/2014 2:53:33 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales
From Time magazine: the neck compressions from the Pantaleo’s chokehold and “the compression of [Garner’s] chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police Isn't that all kind of a fancy way of saying that he couldn't breathe? That whole lack of oxygen thingy?
400 posted on 12/04/2014 3:12:41 PM PST by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 461-476 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson