DHS chief: Obama's immigration order will be 'comprehensive'

The Hill ^ | 11/19/14 | Jesse Byrnes

[b4its2late]

He’ll do whatever he wants. The Pubbies will do nothing. I’m sick of worrying about it all.

[Newbomb Turk]

Rope, lamp post. End of problem.

[Jane Long]

Your impeachment proceedings will be comprehensive. Borders, Benghazi, arming al qaeda.

—

How do we get those started? Our compromised and corrupted Speaker doesn’t appear to want to discuss that option.

[lacrew]

“but we’ve waited now for years to get Congress to act, and Congress has not acted”

Congress = will of the people.

Shouldn’t the will of the people control?

Barry needs to watch some Schoolhouse Rock to figure out how to make a law.

[no-to-illegals]

Have your shooters ready, please, Sir!

[no-to-illegals]

Amen!

[no-to-illegals]

Time for your Roar?

[BitWielder1]

Comprehensive = Slime speak for Huge Bill With Lots Of Crap That Would Never Pass If Voted On Separately.

[LibFreeUSA]

"Legislative action is always preferable, but we’ve waited now for years to get Congress to act, and Congress has not acted."

So, we have the new Julius Caesar..... let's just replace Congress!

[no-to-illegals]

You are better than me ... I turn my eyes away!

[plain talk]

Obama should have already been impeached and now facing a 2nd or 3rd impeachment. I say put pressure on members of Congress to duty their and impeach this SOB. Ignore the RINOS and bedwetters.

[randita]

Good for you. We should all contact our Senators and Congressman, no matter whether they’re DEM or GOP. Let them know you do not approve of Obama doing this.

[randita]

“not taking action” is an action. That needs to be clearly understood.

Exactly. That's how the process works. Our Congresspersons and Senators are the ones closest to their constituents and most accountable to them. If those elected officials do nothing, it's because they don't have the support of their constituents.

We are a republic, not a direct democracy, and certainly not ruled by a monarchy.

[aquila48]

““Legislative action is always preferable, but we’ve waited now for years to get Congress to act, and Congress has not acted.” “

This idiotic canard keeps getting repeated and none of our pathetic “leaders” are articulate enough to shoot it down.

Congress NOT acting on something the president wants IS acting, IS expressing the will of the people. If congress is expected to pass whatever the president wants, then why even have a congress?

[Jane Long]

I called my RINO rep, too. His staffer mentioned the withholding funding line, too. I said.. “yeah, yeah...we’ve heard that one, before. What about supporting Articles of Impeachment against 0bola? Does he support that?!”

He hemmed and hawed...but finally answered....possibly.

I also asked if Boehner and Midge happened to sleep - or pass out - right through this last election...as they don’t seem to get that WE WON!

[BenLurkin]

“Legislative action is always preferable, but we’ve waited now for years to get Congress to act, and Congress has not acted.”

Scary shtt — when the executive aggrandizes unconstitutional power to himself on such an inappropriate premise.

[MikeinMotley]

thats a BIG 10-4!

Mike

[BenLurkin]

Bump!

[no-to-illegals]

Thank Mike ... We have an acclamation, and you know too!

[no-to-illegals]

We know it Mike, but we don’t talk too much about it. Yes, Mike, we tried to inform them! Thanks Mike!