Skip to comments.
DHS chief: Obama's immigration order will be 'comprehensive'
The Hill ^
| 11/19/14
| Jesse Byrnes
Posted on 11/19/2014 11:47:24 AM PST by jimbo123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
1
posted on
11/19/2014 11:47:24 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
I notice the DHS Secretary still hasn't found the rest of his first name.
2
posted on
11/19/2014 11:48:32 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: jimbo123
And totally unconstitutional.
3
posted on
11/19/2014 11:48:40 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: jimbo123
4
posted on
11/19/2014 11:48:56 AM PST
by
YourAdHere
(I just took a big Obama.)
To: WayneS
Maybe the Botswana Export Development & Investment Authority (BEDIA) took it...
5
posted on
11/19/2014 11:50:24 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: jimbo123
It’s time to stop fooling around with the Kenyan emperor. IMPEACH now! We’ve still got the U.S. Constitution on our side. It’s time to use it!
6
posted on
11/19/2014 11:50:33 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
('Provisional ballots'. When legal votes just aren't getting the job done. - The DemocRATS.)
To: jimbo123
Legislative action is always preferable, but weve waited now for years to get Congress to act, and Congress has not acted.Not a valid excuse, and legislation is required, not preferable.
7
posted on
11/19/2014 11:51:11 AM PST
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: jimbo123
Congress has not acted
That used to be called 'checks and balances.'
8
posted on
11/19/2014 11:51:24 AM PST
by
posterchild
(It takes a politician to declare a settled science.)
To: jimbo123
Johnson said he believed Obamas policy moves would fall within a fairly wide latitude within existing executive authority to fix the system. More BS. Executive orders are supposed to provide guidance to executive branch agencies to comply with existing law.
Odinga's executive orders are for agencies to act in direct violation of existing law.
9
posted on
11/19/2014 11:51:26 AM PST
by
meadsjn
To: jimbo123
Obama is poised to announce comprehensive . . . commonsense steps That is very bad news. "Comprehensive" is code for multiple actions all of which are outside the appropriate scope of governmental power, and "commonsense" is code for insanely destructive.
10
posted on
11/19/2014 11:51:38 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: jimbo123
Really?
“So let it be written, so let it be done”
Our Pharaoh is brilliant. ..
11
posted on
11/19/2014 11:51:58 AM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: FlingWingFlyer
You do know with the impeach shouts, rants, raves are all pointless with spineless ball-less GOP-e and will legitimize this activity?
12
posted on
11/19/2014 11:53:23 AM PST
by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: jimbo123
13
posted on
11/19/2014 11:54:39 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
To: jimbo123
“Legislative action is always preferable,”
Only in countries where the rule of law is valued. Otherwise legislative action just makes it harder for tyrants and despots to rule efficiently. Countries such as Russia and North Korea do things more efficiently.
To: jimbo123
When posters here listen to traitor Obama, listen for the time he refers to his favorite phrase that he often uses when he makes a decision on an important/controversial subject like immigration reform:
He will say something like this, maybe say it several times:
"It was the right thing to do. It was the right thing to do", as if he prayed all night asking God what to do, and he was given some divine inspiration to make such a terrible decision.
What a bunch of crap. I hope that the American people condemn and jeer Obama the rest of his life for such traitorous action.
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
How the Hell is this legal?
17
posted on
11/19/2014 11:55:31 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: jimbo123
Well this is easy to thwart... lots of folks can start rumors that info gathered under this amnesty will be used against the illegals in the future by the next administration.
And - that should happen.
ANd we can start talk about what the next R president can do with the newly discovered power. Imagine just wishing away the Dept of Education - send money back to States instead. Imagine just wishing away the EPA. Imagine when an R president tells the IRS not to go after any capital gains tax. .... Imagine a lot of good will come with this new power.
I also like it that maybe this will get the Rs in Congess to frickin’ fight back just a little!
18
posted on
11/19/2014 11:57:01 AM PST
by
Principled
(Obama: Unblemished by success.)
To: jimbo123
Once again, the umpteenth clearly illegal act being performed, and more brazen.
Will the man step down in January 2017? Who’s going to stop him?
We don’t already.
19
posted on
11/19/2014 11:57:56 AM PST
by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: Gene Eric
20
posted on
11/19/2014 11:58:27 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson