Posted on 10/18/2014 4:45:34 AM PDT by chrisnj
Any day I can feed a liberals delusion is indeed a fine day.
The best thing about these tender moments is the lurkers can read the cheshires’ empty arguments for more lib GOP types and think for themselves. And as all the converts on FR alone prove, Your positions are not winning the debate.
Mine, and those us evil purists share, are.
I don’t think you’re evil. I just think you’re a fool.
Considering many of my points come directly from his own speeches? Like not turning the party over to the GOP hacks after taking it from them you mean?
I think RR and I are close enough to be on the same team.
That sharp pain on the poll, that’s the bricks.
Probably comes as a shock to you, but that gives me a happy. It’s nice to know people whose positions I despise think poorly of me. Gives me hope.
No bill generated in the house by Republican’s will be entertained in the US Senate period per the rule of reid.
...and you know it. Bad argument by another of those who should feel just a teeny bit of shame for the attempt to mislead those who don’t know the facts.
The facts as stated so well in 181 by Jarhead9297
Ronald Reagan, GW Bush each claimed to be all 5.
Pres. Bush became suspect on the ‘borders’ part of the national security topic.
Ronald Reagan preceded our generation’s careful analysis of the ‘borders’ issue. My own opinions hadn’t congealed at that point, although I disagreed with his amnesty. I think he would now, too.
Both were solidly pro-life on their ascendancy to the presidency.
GHW Bush said all the right things. He probably didn’t believe in some of them regarding life and guns. He is evidence, though, that there are some solid candidates on the other side whose beliefs I would now consider suspect.
One of the greatest orators, doers, and organizers of the republican party, in my opinion, is Rudy Guiliani. His beliefs, though, disqualify him. Such a waste.
When “not electing a RINO” on election day means that a communist gets elected instead, everyone loses.
We’re living it.
“I think he would now, too.”
He did. Called it his greatest mistake.
What position? I’m just a schlub on the interwebs. Yet it’s obvious that you’re a fool. Sorry if that’s painful to you.
Poll = the area on the top of your head. :-)
Shoulda joined us in the primaries instead of going to Mitt. Had all republicans done that we’d have won. With ANY of the alsorans.v Who were ALL more conservative.
But folks knew better cuz mitt could WIN!
We tried telling you.
No pain here. Buuuut keep talking dirty to me. It makes me all warm and fuzzy and stuff.
Ping for GOP lovefest
Um, okay. I destroyed you several hundred posts ago. But if you want keep burbling on, I guess I will oblige?
I have a pretty good idea that you are right!
Well said to deaf ears.
Remaining comments self censored.
Yea I’m shamed terribly. Pieces of me everywhere.
So are you ever gonna explain the whole GOP promise of Amnesty I asked about several hundred posts ago that you can’t find the time for or just keep claiming some kind of ‘win’?
So, in other words, you really don't have any principles that are non-negotiable.
What you apparently can't see is that once you've bought into the "lesser of two evils," utilitarian, hegelian deception, the only direction you're going is down, down, down.
And that the only possible way off that inevitable descent is to stop compromising.
Probably for the best. you haven’t said anything worth reading anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.