Skip to comments.
Colorado marijuana revenues hit a new high
Washington Post ^
| Oct. 14, 2014
Posted on 10/15/2014 10:34:50 AM PDT by Wolfie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-253 next last
To: elhombrelibre
The usual hypocrisy: "One imbibes [scotch] finally for the relaxed feeling it imparts. [...] One smokes [pot] for the effect."
221
posted on
10/22/2014 12:34:03 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
He’s spot on. Pot heads are dopes, dull, and boring. People who have a drink or two are convivial. This is self-evident.
222
posted on
10/22/2014 12:35:21 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
"Marijuana use by adolescents declined from the late 1990s until the mid-to-late 2000s, but has been on the increase since then." That is, since well before legalization.
223
posted on
10/22/2014 12:36:15 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
Right. So do you suppose with legalization it will reverse! LOL. Wow, dude, drop the bong for a few minutes.
224
posted on
10/22/2014 12:37:46 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
pot use by kids. But since you think that's okayBack to lying about me, I see. The Drug Warrior returns to his own vomit.
225
posted on
10/22/2014 12:38:00 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
YOU write that you favor drug legalization. Only a fool thinks that won’t mean more kids using dope.
226
posted on
10/22/2014 12:39:08 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
"Marijuana use by adolescents declined from the late 1990s until the mid-to-late 2000s, but has been on the increase since then." That is, since well before legalization.Right. So do you suppose with legalization it will reverse!
Your evidence shows it rises and falls independent of government policy.
227
posted on
10/22/2014 12:39:25 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
“The growing perception of marijuana as a safe drug may reflect recent public discussions over medical marijuana and movements to legalize the drug for adult recreational use in some states.”
228
posted on
10/22/2014 12:40:00 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
As I pointed out last time you told that lie, since well before any state had legalized pot, teens have reported that they could get it more easily than beer or cigarettes ... which is to be expected since legal sellers card and illegal sellers don't.
229
posted on
10/22/2014 12:40:21 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: elhombrelibre
The growing perception of marijuana as a safe drug may reflect recent public discussions over medical marijuana and movements to legalize the drug for adult recreational use in some states.We should combat mistaken ideas about things by banning them?
230
posted on
10/22/2014 12:41:35 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
Using your logic, we’d keep electing Liberals.
231
posted on
10/22/2014 12:46:12 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: ConservingFreedom
It’s pretty good evidence that the “just say yes” crowd is encouraging more kids to smoke more pot.
232
posted on
10/22/2014 12:48:17 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
We should combat mistaken ideas about things by banning them?Using your logic, wed keep electing Liberals.
To vote against a candidate is a very different act than to ban a commodity or activity.
233
posted on
10/22/2014 12:49:02 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: elhombrelibre
"May" is pretty good evidence?
234
posted on
10/22/2014 12:49:45 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
Most of what you write is pure speculation and bunk, so I’d say it beats your prejudice.
235
posted on
10/22/2014 12:53:27 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: ConservingFreedom
Are you for prostitution too? I bet you are.
236
posted on
10/22/2014 12:54:32 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
Perhaps pot heads don’t feel the need or desire for conviviality that those having a drink or two do? This also is self-evident.
To: southernmann
I think you’re right. Potheads often like to just space out and drift away from reality. Alcohol drinkers lose inhibition and for some it allows them to come out of their shell. Others let the devil out of themselves after just a couple of drinks. Each drug has its downside and tradeoffs. I think we fool ourselves when we uncritically praise pot like some posters or act like we have to find no fault with booze.
238
posted on
10/25/2014 12:35:39 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: elhombrelibre
I don’t like praising or finding fault with either one. I think it’s a personal issue. No matter what, people will do what they want...and others will approve or disapprove.
To: southernmann
I think both have their downside. I’m troubled by the emerging sense that pot is harmless. It isn’t. I know from a family members experience and sons of friend’s of mine. It may become impossible to keep it illegal if the “it’s just good fun” or the “it’s safe” crowd win over enough people.
240
posted on
10/26/2014 11:08:32 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-253 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson