Skip to comments.
Free Republic is here to fight for the founding principles and our God-given Liberty!!
Oct. 6, 2014
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 10/06/2014 12:34:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Edited on 10/06/2014 7:54:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: tomkat
21
posted on
10/06/2014 12:52:57 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: lormand
We need to know more about judges before they get elected. These judges that overturn the vote of the people are the biggest problem.
To: al baby
Thank you very much, al baby!!
23
posted on
10/06/2014 12:53:33 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Resettozero
No, you'd have us get YOUR idea of hunky dory.
The crux, which you seem to want to dodge, is the 'only'.
Get in my face with 'evangelical' anything and your nose is liable to spring a leak.
24
posted on
10/06/2014 12:55:08 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: tomkat
Thats not what it says .. but Im guessing you already know that.
It wasn't positively clear to me what you meant. What DO you mean?
To: tomkat
Your post #24 answered my question sufficiently. I DID understand what you fumbled around to say.
No, this Country at this time is in no danger of being overrun by marauding hordes of Christ-followers.
Not in your face! THIS IS FREE REPUBLIC!
To: Jim Robinson
” No surrender, no retreat!! “
I take a vow to stand by this ethic , until my last breath.
To: Resettozero
It sounds as though you're dictating that
only evangelical Christians deserve support.
Lot of folks out here, myself included, believe there's a God behind all this, but perhaps or even certainly not YOUR interpretation or method of tactical support thereof.
What if another poster had substituted Catholic or Buddhist for your 'evangelical' ?
Is your priority of support primarily political or theocratic ?
If the latter, you need to re-read our Founding documents.
28
posted on
10/06/2014 1:03:38 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: Jim Robinson
Amen and God bless you and your family!!!
29
posted on
10/06/2014 1:06:14 PM PDT
by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: tomkat; Resettozero
evangelical
[ ˌivanˈjelikəl ]
adjective
of or according to the teaching of the gospel or the Christian religion.
synonyms: scriptural · biblical · fundamentalist
So what's wrong with the above?
30
posted on
10/06/2014 1:06:37 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Resettozero
I made a typo, but 'fumbled around' with nothing.
And as you seem to be content with impatiently answering yourself above, I've an acre to mow and God's beautiful autumn day to enjoy.
Good luck with that whole sectarian warfare thing .. you'll need it.
Cheers
31
posted on
10/06/2014 1:07:16 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: tomkat
What if another poster had substituted Catholic or Buddhist for your 'evangelical'?
If you are 100% certain a Roman Catholic such as Nancy Pelosi or all Buddhists will vote against the Marxist homosexual agenda, go for it.
But don't change the subject of this thread.
To: DJ MacWoW
re Evangelize: see Elmer Gantry, et al
33
posted on
10/06/2014 1:10:24 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: Jim Robinson
To: Jim Robinson
GOPe should show up right about now.
Popcorn ready.
35
posted on
10/06/2014 1:12:30 PM PDT
by
right way right
(America has embraced the suck of Freedumb.)
To: tomkat
Good luck with that whole sectarian warfare thing .. you'll need it.
Not quilty. Just was posting my opinion on FR. Mowed my yard Friday. Perhaps I could have chosen differently rather than using the phrase "evangelical Christian" and wouldn't have offended you. Still, I think any way I might have said it would have offended you.
To: tomkat; Resettozero
The Pilgrims came here to evangelize. The Mayflower Compact says:
Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith Spreading the Christian faith, that's called evangelizing. It is what believers are called to do.
However it appears that you and Resettozero have s history that I have no knowledge of so I'm stepping out of this.
37
posted on
10/06/2014 1:16:02 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Jim Robinson
Sorry for the semi-hijack, boss .. but I'm outta here awhile to tend to the Deere .. thanks for the thread.
A theocratic oligarchy is still an oligarchy, and I'll be ruled by neither.
38
posted on
10/06/2014 1:17:33 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: tomkat
Btw, Gantry was fictional and Sinclair Lewis was a Commie. Just thought you should know.
39
posted on
10/06/2014 1:25:29 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: tomkat
[ No, you’d have us get YOUR idea of hunky dory.
The crux, which you seem to want to dodge, is the ‘only’.
Get in my face with ‘evangelical’ anything and your nose is liable to spring a leak. ]
Agree 100000%
We do NOT want Huckabee 2016....
40
posted on
10/06/2014 1:27:27 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson