Gee, I'm shocked. Could have never seen that one coming.
I am just waiting for a Federal judge to strike down part of a state's incest law.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: markomalley
2 posted on
08/27/2014 7:12:53 PM PDT by
bunkerhill7
("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
To: markomalley
3 posted on
08/27/2014 7:14:45 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: markomalley
When will it be mandatory?
To: markomalley
Incest will be followed by bestiality and necrophilia. Our grandchildren will be allowed to marry household appliances.
5 posted on
08/27/2014 7:15:26 PM PDT by
henkster
(Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: markomalley
When you’re 19 you may think this means more sex.
Before you’re 40 you’ll know it means more “input”.
uh...you won’t have to ask....it just shows up.
6 posted on
08/27/2014 7:16:55 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: markomalley
This is a good ruling. How do you enforce this on cohabitating individuals? Will you go and do DNA tests on children? What about if the man involved is sterile?
The state regulates marriage for better or worse, but cohabitating?
7 posted on
08/27/2014 7:17:40 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: markomalley
Gee, weren’t we told that homosexual marriage was just that and no it would not lead to legalization of polygamy, beastality or any other weird stuff? I could swear I heard that somewhere.
Of course I also have these odd memories where we were promised that the first seat belt laws would never be used as a “primary” offense and no one would EVER be pulled over just for that.
What did Orwell call these? False memories?
8 posted on
08/27/2014 7:23:04 PM PDT by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
To: markomalley
Thanks for posting this, Brother! It was only a matter of time before the other shoe would drop.
"Dia shábháil ar fad anseo!"
Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!
Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)
9 posted on
08/27/2014 7:24:26 PM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in Battle!)
To: markomalley
In order to become states, Utah, along with three other states, Idaho, Arizona and Oklahoma, had to agree to forsake plural marriage in perpetuity.
Either this silly judge’s opinion is moot, or those states are no longer states in the Union. The contract has been negated.
To: markomalley
When anyone can marry anyone, and in any number or combination - then marriage effectively becomes meaningless from the standpoint of the state. The next step is to ban marriage as a legal institution.
To: markomalley
Certainly makes more sense than the court rulings legalizing same-sex marriage. At least the pieces fit together.
To: markomalley
A necessary ruling to further prepare America for the takeover by the islamonazis pouring in here every day now.
24 posted on
08/27/2014 8:00:44 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..) n)
To: markomalley
A man an his horse (and his sheep) is next.
25 posted on
08/27/2014 8:00:47 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: markomalley
We all knew this was coming.
27 posted on
08/27/2014 8:02:35 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: markomalley
28 posted on
08/27/2014 8:03:21 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: markomalley
Polygamy now? Let’s see... to judges: marriage = one man-two females or two guys one boy or a female and a tree or a boy and his wagon. (Yes when I was 5 I wanted to marry my Radio Flyer wagon).
33 posted on
08/27/2014 8:21:21 PM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: markomalley
35 posted on
08/27/2014 8:25:20 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: markomalley
and of course, February-November marriages
what’s wrong with a 12 yr old marrying the man she loves? so what if he’s 50...love is all that matters
/sarc
36 posted on
08/27/2014 8:25:36 PM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: markomalley
Damn. I hope my wife doesn’t try to talk me into taking in that ugly old maid cousin of hers.
To: markomalley
and down the slippery slope we go.
40 posted on
08/27/2014 9:36:00 PM PDT by
Cubs Fan
(If you're on the same side of Ferguson as Al and Jesse, then you F-ed up somewhere. Rethink it dummy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson